tikited
Me
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 18,220
- Reaction score
- 5,484
- Points
- 113
The problem with calling him the "best" player is that Breu only touched the ball in the paint. He never dribbled the ball up the floor or played the point on a press. He was good for the role he played, but hardly the best player on the teams he played on. Both McHale and Tucker were superior to Breu. Even Breu's last year was established by the play of Davis. Without players to get Breu the rock in his 10 foot shooting range he'd never have had an impact other than misdirecting a few shots on defense. His mediocrity shows up in his NBA stats where he was the quintessential backup.
Read the stats again.
On to your assertion that Breuer was only a role player because he didn't dribble the ball up the court is just plain weird. I guess Shaq was only a role player. Karl Malone was just a role player. I could go on, but you should see it by now.
To expect any Soph. to be better or as good as McHale was as a Sr. isn't at all fair.
He was light years better than Tommy Davis, that season, and it should be argued that the play of Breuer established Davis more so than the other way around.