I refuse to debate someone who simply ignores the arguments of the person on the other side. The point of my last post was that you don't judge a coach's player development by his top players unless they weren't so good to start with, but you insist on doing just that.
Crediting Pitino for the development of Austin Hollins is laughable. Austin was tremendously motivated, a natural leader, and the son of an NBA coach. Furthermore, he played only one year for Pitino. I'll give Pitino credit for getting Walker to lose weight. Oturu was very good when he arrived here. His improvement in production this year is about what you would expect from a player of his caliber who is now the #1 player on the team instead of the third or fourth option. I've already commented on Murphy and Mason.
If players get better than when they started- that's development. By your standards, Tom Izzo and Coach K never develop players because they are all good anyway- all 4 and 5 stars. Hollins played better under Pitino than any year under Tubby and I would say that is because of the more open system, but that's a fair criticism of my analysis.