swgopherdog
Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2015
- Messages
- 272
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
Check out is latest article. What a moran. Can't wait to pile on.
Go Gophers
Go Gophers
Check out is latest article. What a moran. Can't wait to pile on.
Go Gophers
Check out is latest article. What a moran. Can't wait to pile on.
Go Gophers
What is PR saying that is despicable, below the belt, or otherwise unfair? Did we read the same article?
He can't deal with set backs? Don't you and Pat know Jerry's life story. Pat needs to get a life. He never liked Kill and he couldn't wait a day or two to think it through and write a fair article. I am canceling my online Tribune today. Enough of the negative crap.
Go Gophers
I really don't know why people on GH continue to post links to the Strib. Just ignore the Strib, your day and life will be much happier .
I'm no attorney, but this smells of libel to me.
It is a great thing for most coaches to reject the reality of setbacks, but obviously not good for a man who is willing to fudge on his epilepsy meds because he thinks it gives him a chance to get a better effort from his team.
What made me most doubtful that the Gophers would settle on Kill was the health situation … meaning cancer, at that time.
And I have to say, while it was wrenching to watch Kill’s emotional retirement announcement early Wednesday morning, there was a sense of relief that this wasn’t the worst health news.
Maybe I’m alone, but when the information on Kill’s sudden retirement started to spread after 7 a.m., I had this thought:
Kill wouldn’t be doing this because of epilepsy. He has a handle on that. It has to be a reoccurrence of his cancer.
Immediately, I went on-line (a bad place for medical information, I agree) to read about what happens when kidney cancer returns. The prognosis wouldn’t cause you to go skipping down the sidewalk in joy.
Early in Wednesday’s announcement, Kill made it clear that he was stepping away because of renewed epileptic seizures– brought on, it seems, when the coach stopped following his doctor’s directives and ignoring his medication schedule..
It is a great thing for most coaches to reject the reality of setbacks, but obviously not good for a man who is willing to fudge on his epilepsy meds because he thinks it gives him a chance to get a better effort from his team.
We have a good hint from 2014 that Kill can handle his epilepsy, as long as he does what he’s supposed to do. As a reporter who didn’t see eye-to-eye with some of Kill’s poor-mouthing this season, and said so, I still liked “Country Jer’’ as a guy, and from here …
Well, it’s good news that what he’s dealing with is his old rival epilepsy, and not a reoccurrence of that “other deal’’ (as he might say) from 10 years ago
Also, he said at the end of the article that he likes Kill. And he is a journalist, he doesn't get a day or two to ruminate on such a big piece of breaking news like this. All hands were on deck and every Strib sports personality except perhaps Sid had something posted before noon today.
I really don't know why people on GH continue to post links to the Strib. Just ignore the Strib, your day and life will be much happier .
Seriously,have you read what many national football writers,who have more on their plate than Fatrick has ever had (OK,don't take that literally) had written and posted online before the Strib piece was up ? Reusse couldn't wait to stick the knife in and twist and it wouldn't have made a difference if he had waited until tomorrow,next week or next year.
The Reusse haters who have posted in this thread are complete morons who each gave Reusse the reaction he was hoping for when he wrote the column. Reusse reads GopherHole as often as he reads the morning newspaper. If you all had just ignored him it would have been a disappointment to him. But you just can't help yourselves and you never fail to do your part to insure that every I Hate Reusse thread goes into multiple pages.
I feel like I am screaming at a wall right now. What did Reusse say that was negative, hatchety, or just mean towards Jerry Kill? And what did he say that could be considered "trolling the readers" like he does with some of his articles?
I feel like I am screaming at a wall right now.
What did Reusse say that was negative, hatchety, or just mean towards Jerry Kill? And what did he say that could be considered "trolling the readers" like he does with some of his articles?