I am so down I can't even be excited. Sill pissed at Kill for starting Nelson and not having his team fired up and for CONSERVATIVE play calling that saps the guts out of me.
I think your complaints are fighting with each other.
So you wanted Kill to start Leidner? Ok, it's debatable, but nothing wrong with that opinion.
You also wanted Kill to open it up? Ok, it's also debatable (he kind of did).
But together, that's a pure headscratcher.
#1: Leidner has only shown he is successful here in a REALLY conservative offense. Remember, we couldn't throw the ball with Mitch against SJSU. We didn't have to, but we couldn't either. We've played nothing but extremely conservative when Mitch enters the game. That's fine and an argument could be made that we should have brought Mitch in and grounded out a game. But you seem to be arguing that you've something in Leidner to suggest that we should have brought him in opened up the offense? What have you seen that makes you think that?
#2: You also seem to be arguing that we were extremely conservative. . . ok? First, lets assume you're right. What have you seen from our QB play and our WR (especially) to suggest something more aggressive would have been even remotely effective? Seriously?
Second, was it really conservative? We ran the ball twice and then threw on our first drive, but we were backed up to the 10 yard line. IT's hard to argue with that logic. The second drive, we threw twice and ran once. The third drive, we threw twice and ran once. . .
Even before we were down, we ran a pretty balanced offense. It wasn't effective in the slightest, but it wasn't especially conservative. It was borderline run-n-gun compared to the SJSU (where you obviously were please with the playcalling). Did you really want us to come out and throw the ball more than 50% of the time? In the rain? With our WRs?
Kill and the team deserve blame for what happened yesterday, but cmon, playcalling is a bad place to go.