gopherbadgerman
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
- Messages
- 5,355
- Reaction score
- 2,584
- Points
- 113
a win is a win. Rhode Island sucks though
Yep....and we did to them what we were supposed to......same thing most of the rest of the conference did last week against similar creampuffs.a win is a win. Rhode Island sucks though
But we dominated them like we should have. The past couple of years have been filled with games against bad teams that we win, but just barely, so this is a welcomed change.a win is a win. Rhode Island sucks though
Gophers had 12 different guys catch a pass today. I can recall games under Fleck when we didn't throw the ball 12 times much less successfully to 12 different guys.
Your point? They played a terrible team and hammered them. What do want them to do? It sounds like no matter what they wouldn't have done you can't find a way to be happy.a win is a win. Rhode Island sucks though
But we dominated them like we should have. The past couple of years have been filled with games against bad teams that we win, but just barely, so this is a welcomed change.
Agree. I just wouldn’t put too much stock in itYep....and we did to them what we were supposed to......same thing most of the rest of the conference did last week against similar creampuffs.
Agreed....but at least the doom and gloom crowd will be a bit quieter this weekAgree. I just wouldn’t put too much stock in it
I’m very happy thanks.Your point? They played a terrible team and hammered them. What do want them to do? It sounds like no matter what they wouldn't have done you can't find a way to be happy.
Agreed....but at least the doom and gloom crowd will be a bit quieter this week
That’s fair but the next game that really matters is IowaAgreed....but at least the doom and gloom crowd will be a bit quieter this week
I think everyone knows that. It's ok to enjoy a win though.I’m very happy thanks.
That’s fair but the next game that really matters is Iowa
It’s totally fine to enjoy win against a crappy opponent. No argument on my end.I think everyone knows that. It's ok to enjoy a win though.
100%. And if it’s DirecTv you work for ask them if they got the bucket of dicks I sent. Please and thank you.Wanting to flip back and forth between the Gopher game on Peacock and the Penn State game is why streaming apps suck, and I work for the owner of one of the very biggest ones.
Sorry, Dick Butkus passed recently.100%. And if it’s DirecTv you work for ask them if they got the bucket of dicks I sent. Please and thank you.
Helmet communication has a lot to do with that.He clearly has the coaches trust as well....no more check with the sideline before the snap.
This is the single most impressive stat to me. Teams that spread the ball around are generally more successful than those that rely on one or two receivers. Tougher to defend. This might not be so much a change in philosophy as having a QB who does his check downs.Gophers had 12 different guys catch a pass today. I can recall games under Fleck when we didn't throw the ball 12 times much less successfully to 12 different guys.
We could have one thread where we comment on good things and bad things happening and then another where just the good stuff is talked about? That way nobody’s feelings will get hurt?The bitching in in game threads isn't discussing football.
That helps but it also stops at 15 seconds so there is still a fair amount of time to adjust before the snap.Helmet communication has a lot to do with that.
Agree totally. I think Daniel Jackson is really good, but he's not a lights-out guy that defenses routinely scheme around so it's good to have other guys in the mix. We'll have to see on Brosmer as the season unfolds further, but what has impressed me is his ability to check-down and spread the ball around as a result. Probably a combination of Brosmer's experience and some welcome adjustments in offensive approach.This is the single most impressive stat to me. Teams that spread the ball around are generally more successful than those that rely on one or two receivers. Tougher to defend. This might not be so much a change in philosophy as having a QB who does his check downs.
Did you see all the trouble Bowling Green game Penn State U. yesterday? On any given day...Anyone remember Bowling Green?
Did you see all the trouble Bowling Green game Penn State U. yesterday? On any given day...
Also UNI vs. Notre Dame comes to mind, too.
Very good observation. Brosmer just might be a qb who on is like an OC on the field. Time will tell.Agree totally. I think Daniel Jackson is really good, but he's not a lights-out guy that defenses routinely scheme around so it's good to have other guys in the mix. We'll have to see on Brosmer as the season unfolds further, but what has impressed me is his ability to check-down and spread the ball around as a result. Probably a combination of Brosmer's experience and some welcome adjustments in offensive approach.
I agree. It's not necessarily a bad thing, but I've always seen Fleck as a bit of a Mr. Sportsmanship when it comes to approaching possible blow-outs. In the past, he seemed to take his foot off the gas once the game was in hand. He probably could have ran up another 20 points on New Mexico State under Kill if he had wanted to do that, but he didn't for a variety of reasons. He hasn't had a ton of blow-out wins, so it is difficult to tell.PJ talks about Schiano being a mentor and apparently Schiano has no issue running up the score. There are no nice guy points in college football.
I just looked at Rutgers stats and they still haven't pulled out their starting RBs to do it. Still just stats for 2 guys. I give PJ praise for getting back-ups in.