***OFFICIAL OREGON AT MINNESOTA IN-GAME THREAD!!!***

Donate To GopherHole



leib0039 said:
So just to preface, I was unable to watch. Did not see one play. Just looking at the box score, this screams of "this is why DG makes the big $$" game. That's what your star is now paid to do. Nice to see him find success at the end of a very good career.

As a hardened CBJ hater, I must say I'm shocked (in a good way) about how he's gotten a team that was 0-5 in conference and filled with guys that could've easily checked out, to play this well. Also kudos to the players, this is a nod to them as well.

Just based off a few pictures that were tweeted out, Barn looked to be pretty full and lively. I know it's old and needs some fixing, but for my money when the basketball is good, it's my favorite arena ever to be in. It just has a bit of mystique. So that is also fun to see.

The one negative I'll say, where in the actual fudge was this the first whatever 13 games? I think we can all agree after our lack luster NC and blowing it to OSU this looked like maybe the worst team in the P5, suddenly 3 straight Q1 wins? It's cool we are better but honestly, what happened to start this year?!? And I don't want to hear it's transfers. That's literally every single team
Click to expand...
I think Mike Mitchell missed 6 games with ankle injury.
 






stocker08 said:
Quick.....let's blame the losses to North Texas and Wichita State on the poor non-conference schedule!
Click to expand...

60's Guy isn't very bright. There's a word for his type of thinking: solipsistic. It's the type of thinking where one believes that all the right answers are inside one's own head and there is no need to consult empirical evidence to check the validity of those beliefs.

Pomeroy ranks our nonconference schedule as #337. Here are some other teams with nonconference schedules ranked in the same general area.

Texas Tech, #329, 14-4

Maryland, #364, 15-5

Missouri, #356, 16-4

BYU, #348, 13-6

Texas, #352, 14-6

Oklahoma, #334, 15-4

Vanderbilt, #345, 16-4
 




Oneoldgopher said:
Give me USAF's losses and I bet I could get my 88-year-old mother to do a cartwheel before she is in the ground. I'm not saying she could do it independently, but George H. W. Bush sky dived as a strap on to another dude. Never say never.
Click to expand...
I'm of the belief that "my 88-year old mother" and "strap on" should never be used in the same paragraph no matter the context.

Unless we win...then you get a free pass from this guy.
 





I don't follow Gopher men's basketball, but I happened to look up the NET rankings, and I see there that Oregon has 8 Quad 1 wins, second most to #1-ranked Auburn, who has 11. (After Oregon, the next three highest have six.)
 

TwistingMyMelon said:
60's Guy isn't very bright. There's a word for his type of thinking: solipsistic. It's the type of thinking where one believes that all the right answers are inside one's own head and there is no need to consult empirical evidence to check the validity of those beliefs.

Pomeroy ranks our nonconference schedule as #337. Here are some other teams with nonconference schedules ranked in the same general area.

Texas Tech, #329, 14-4

Maryland, #364, 15-5

Missouri, #356, 16-4

BYU, #348, 13-6

Texas, #352, 14-6

Oklahoma, #334, 15-4

Vanderbilt, #345, 16-4
Click to expand...
So sad that’s Minnesota talking. Why can’t we strive to be better
 

STPGopher said:
Agree with you. Not so much on here, but there are some "fans" that are like that. Some just want him to fail so that they can say see I told you so.
Click to expand...

Most fans just want to see the Gophers regularly make the NCAA tournament. Which is a low, and attainable bar.
 

TwistingMyMelon said:
60's Guy isn't very bright. There's a word for his type of thinking: solipsistic. It's the type of thinking where one believes that all the right answers are inside one's own head and there is no need to consult empirical evidence to check the validity of those beliefs.

Pomeroy ranks our nonconference schedule as #337. Here are some other teams with nonconference schedules ranked in the same general area.

Texas Tech, #329, 14-4

Maryland, #364, 15-5

Missouri, #356, 16-4

BYU, #348, 13-6

Texas, #352, 14-6

Oklahoma, #334, 15-4

Vanderbilt, #345, 16-4
Click to expand...
Oklahoma played (and beat) Providence, Arizona, Louisville, Georgia Tech, Oklahoma State and Michigan. How on earth does that = #334 strength of schedule?
 


TwistingMyMelon said:
I'm not sure what your comment means. The point of my post was that having a weak nonconference schedule doesn't doom you to a poor season when you get to conference play.
Click to expand...
Right.

What dooms you is a bad coach leading a talent starved team.

Add the weak nonconference schedule and we hit the trifecta.
 

stocker08 said:
Quick.....let's blame the losses to North Texas and Wichita State on the poor non-conference schedule!
Click to expand...
Wichita State is about 60 spots lower than the bottom teams in the Big Ten and about 100 lower than the middle and 145 lower than the top of the conference in the NET. That is not preparing you to play Big Ten teams.

Nobody knew North Texas was solid when we played and surely not when we scheduled them.

So I’m really not sure what your point is? Other than we lost so they must be good?
Or, if we can’t beat them how could we play tougher teams? What?
 

This was the most "real" of the 3 wins to me in terms of quality of play and not being fluky. The "theory" of this team of Dawson Garcia being consistently very good and then getting a really good performance from one other guy out of a group of 4-5 players has started to actually come to fruition. Against Michigan it was Patterson, against Iowa it was Odukale, and against Oregon it was Fox. If that recipe can continue to replicated they should avoid missing the Big Ten tournament which seemed like a lock at 0-6.

That charge Dawson took was the play of the game. Pretty rare for your best offensive player by a mile to also be the guy who makes a play like that.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.



Top Bottom