That’s the next step.We didn’t though. We lost. As we find ways to continually do against our primary rivals. Nice to beat Penn St. but beat a ranked team and/or our rivals to garner any real traction.
That’s the next step.We didn’t though. We lost. As we find ways to continually do against our primary rivals. Nice to beat Penn St. but beat a ranked team and/or our rivals to garner any real traction.
We didn’t though. We lost. As we find ways to continually do against our primary rivals. Nice to beat Penn St. but beat a ranked team and/or our rivals to garner any real traction.
Johnson still has a chance to save the season now after this win but honestly we shouldn’t have been down to Penn State in the first place. Continued slow starts and long bad stretches will make it impossible to come back against any but the bottom of the Big Ten.
We were down 15 to the Badgers too.....and probably should have won that game.
Coming back to outscore the opponent by 23 points in the second half gives the team plenty of traction. Shooting 89% from the line gives them both confidence and traction.We didn’t though. We lost. As we find ways to continually do against our primary rivals. Nice to beat Penn St. but beat a ranked team and/or our rivals to garner any real traction.
If they are grossly wrong about what they are saying, yes indeed I will admonish them.No...I, just like you, used your "simple arithmetic"logic to come to a totally irrelevant conclusion used to admonish another poster, just the way you did.
"What's good for the goose..."
What did I say the score should have been?Entertaining to see Hardy and Greta still arguing about what the score should have been.