Maybe there was a time when much less was at stake and certainly a lot less money was involved, but times, oh man, the times have changed.
Officiating, as a profession, has not evolved. They remain the same aloof secret society that they have always been, never having to answer for their performance and having droves of people still flocking to their defense at the mere
thought of accountability. In my opinion, part of the reason they get the abuse they do is because they never do anything to address concerns or answer legitimate questions about calls they made (or didn't make). If a coach brings it up, they risk fines and further bias in future games. As a result of their god-like behavior, people are left to fill in the gaps, and it is usually not going to be in favor of the officials. Some transparency and explanation would go a long way towards rebuilding trust and integrity in their profession. It would also help educate the fan base on why things are called a certain way. The more people understand the rules, the less likely they are to fill in the missing pieces with conspiratorial crap. They could also really use to accept the fact that they are going to f up at times. Owning it wouldn't diminish them (unless it continues to happen), and at least I can respect a guy that is man enough to admit they screwed up.
Basketball seems to have more than its fair share of officials who have as large or larger egos than the players they are officiating. Some of them, like it or not, enjoy the attention. They get off on the power, and they screw it up for everyone else. Weed these a$$holes out. Don't do the turtle hoping it magically goes away. It won't, and it will blow up in your face at the worst possible time.
I'm a data driven guy. If I'm looking at an officiating crew for a game and see that one team is 0 - 68 when on the road with a particular guy running the show, my anomaly detector explodes. At a bare minimum I'm asking a bunch of why questions. Ideally I'm reviewing game footage to look for potential bias, because that kind of data screams something different is happening. Skewness of that degree is not purely coincidence. If it is, that team (Gophers) are some of the most unlucky sob's on the planet.