Holy crap, this has to be a bit. Where did I say you should fall over backwards about this? If Pitino doesn't bring in Mathieu last year Hollins plays the point all year and we probably don't even make the NIT. You're so blinded by your hate that you can't at least give Pitino credit for finding an all conference honorable mention player that late in the recruiting process. He's a good player no matter how much you try to downplay him.
Fair enough but I think he has shown enough to me that he is at least a solid player at a position of need.
And there is nothing wrong with that.
I'll give you Lofton. Do you have proof that McNeil had previous issues or character problems? If not, then this is just something that happens from time to time.
You mean the guy who had offers from schools like Florida St., California, Gonzaga, Oklahoma St., Pittsburgh, UCLA, Washington, and Washington St.? What happened with him had very little to do with his talent being questionable. Most frosh struggle early on in their career. To say he was not talented because of 8 games is ridiculous.
Yep, no other coaches have issues with players transferring or getting in trouble.
You have a great basketball mind. None of these big men who are frosh or still in high school haven't proven to you that they are good enough for the Big Ten. Seriously, think about that. How ridiculous does that sound?
You're being such a hypocrite. You're willing to rip Pitino for guys who don't appear to be good enough to you yet won't give him credit for the guys who are good enough. You're mad at people for being optimistic about the future because Pitino hasn't proven anything yet, but have no problem ripping him for seasons that haven't even happened yet.