Simon did the game plan for the Auburn game. Prove me wrong. You can't. He did every bit as much game planning during 2019 as KC did. Again, prove me wrong. You can't.
Paradoxically, the passing game got better after Bateman re-opted out. I do agree that "feels" correct, but I don't know what the stats have to say about that. Particularly Morgan's.
There are rumors on GH that Bateman was promised a certain number of targets and/or to be featured out of the slot, as that perhaps is his projected position in the league. No one can prove this to be true, and if it were, to what degree is it the fault of Fleck and/or Sanford for actually forcing it upon the offense. The crescendo of failure being the Iowa game.
Also no one here could say, for example, if something internally changed after the Iowa game. Eg, Fleck taking a bigger role, or giving a bigger role to Simon, or anything along those lines. It's a black box.
If Love/Utah State was the only datapoint, you'd have a halfway decent argument for dismissing that. But that is not the case, and you conveniently refuse to address the Western Kentucky debacle. How much better the team and offense did immediately prior to and after Sanford's arrival/departure. That they fired him after two years.
All that said, again, unless a miracle happens and someone else hires him away, it's guaranteed etched in stone that Sanford will be our OC for 2021. And I sure as hell don't want to just throw away that season simply to spite him and Fleck's nepotism. So, begrudingly, I have to root for Sanford to make a huge step change. (or for Fleck to, somehow, internally give more control to Simon and Callahan (who still the running game coordinator in 2020, also having served that role in 2019)