MplsGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
- Messages
- 36,668
- Reaction score
- 10,149
- Points
- 113
Absolutely I was, for that small section.you're stereotyping people
Absolutely I was, for that small section.you're stereotyping people
I wonder how the administration would work for say Anoka Hennepin to now have 5 superintendants instead of 1 now share any money across the district. Like you said when was the last time this happened?Those weren't the districts actually splitting into new, separate districts.
Maybe there should be a state law, though: one high school = one district, with all associated admin and feeder & alternative schools.
Who draws up district lines? County or State?Nothing prevents it.
Guessing there have been more than zero new school districts created in the state since 19xx that weren't from combining smaller districts. Could easily be wrong.
I don't think any county, city, or the state ever sat down and said "OK, this is how we're going to divide up the state into school districts".Who draws up district lines? County or State?
Neither. They are separate from county or municipal boundaries, with the possible exception of Minneapolis and St. Paul. Thus the term "independent school district." Most formed from the consolidation of smaller country schools, even in places like Wayzata, or Stillwater, or Forest Lake.Who draws up district lines? County or State?
What word is this a definition of:Absolutely I was, for that small section.
Virtually nobody, at least in this state, is specializing in football year round. Maybe in Texas or Florida. It's the specialization in other sports, and not just the large high schools, that is taking kids away from football. Most notably hockey.There is just no reason in the slightest for a young person to play padded tackle football before 9th grade. If you have the physical tools, you can still get to varsity.
The key thing is not to send your kid to a psycho overcrowded school hell bent on championships that forces kids to practice year round and specialize from 2nd grade onward.
Yes. And districts with multiple high schools (anoka Hennepin, Rosemount apple valley Eagan, osseo, south Washington county) you have to navigate local politics a lot more when it comes to number of assistant coaches, facilities, etcNo, but the talent shift to newer parts of town is now at South. The best programs are desireable communities that can get young families to recycle homes and stay through High School.
A lot of the homes in the LS attendance area, I would bet are as high as anywhere in the metro in terms of "first family in the home".
Unless you're saying that kids that would normally go to North, are transferring to South. That is possible.
It is odd. A recipe for losing kids to other districts. However, if you allow it one school might die while Another livesAnd I think in some districts with multiple high schools, they don't allow intra-district open enrollment. I believe, though not positive, Robbinsdale does not.
Makes perfect sense to me.Here's my theory. I don't live in Lakeville, but am adjacent and have several friends connected to both LN & LS, just to preface it.
In the 10 years after the split I know of several examples where kids (multiple families & sports) who lived in the LS zone, open enrolled to LN. They did it because of the strong tradition to play for highly successful coaches, be with friends and where siblings played. The schools are only 2 miles apart so so that's not much of a factor, and it was possible that LN was even closer. At least one LN team that dominated (not football) had several players that were open enrollees.
As coaches move on or retire less of a pull to transfer/open enroll. Now LS at least has some of their own tradition, and kids want to stay with the friends they have been with through the feeder systems their whole lives.
Agree, in the sense that there aren't clubs and/or year-round (indoor) training facilities for football specific skills and off-season club team practices.Virtually nobody, at least in this state, is specializing in football year round.
RightIt's the specialization in other sports, and not just the large high schools
I wasn't even going for the point of taking kids away from football, rather forcing kids to silo and specialize into a single sport.that is taking kids away from football. Most notably hockey.
Oh, I'm sure that's why. I'd be shocked if Osseo allowed it as well.It is odd. A recipe for losing kids to other districts. However, if you allow it one school might die while Another lives
Agree, in the sense that there aren't clubs and/or year-round (indoor) training facilities for football specific skills and off-season club team practices.
Frankly, not sure why they haven't popped up, like AAU basketball and club volleyball, hockey, baseball, etc etc etc
I wasn't even going for the point of taking kids away from football, rather forcing kids to silo and specialize into a single sport.
It depends a lot on how full the schools are. Sometimes they like having kids switch high schools if it alleviates crowding at one.And I think in some districts with multiple high schools, they don't allow intra-district open enrollment. I believe, though not positive, Robbinsdale does not.
Yeah I was surprised STMA got that far. I think South beats Maple Grove, I’m not sure south could stay within 28 points of last years South team.40-0 after 3 for Lakeville South. They win 40-14 over STMA. Should be a good final against Maple Grove.
Only on prepspotlight.tv I believeAre the 1A games televised this morning?
I do think one school districts make is easier to fundraise, upgrade facilities, etc because you don't need to worry about equality with the rest of the district (ie Blaine can't get a stadium upgrade unless Coon Rapids, Anoka, etc get one).What makes them those, out of curiosity, in your opinion?
There's obviously pay.
But you can't recruit and you can't pay players. You have to play with what you've got. So I assume you feel these have the most talent in the biggest/best feeder programs?
And what else could there be?
Also, mplsgopher - obviously pay? I have coached hs football at a few places - all have had a district contracted salary that have all been very similar. I guess some guys could profit off of youth camps, etc but all of the HC I worked with paid us for our time and then put the rest back into the program.I do think one school districts make is easier to fundraise, upgrade facilities, etc because you don't need to worry about equality with the rest of the district (ie Blaine can't get a stadium upgrade unless Coon Rapids, Anoka, etc get one).
I think districts with growth also have an advantage with more housing availability. Areas like Minnetonka and Edina have no where to grow. Minnetonka has, from what I understand, one of the best youth football programs around though.
There is very little variance in payAlso, mplsgopher - obviously pay? I have coached hs football at a few places - all have had a district contracted salary that have all been very similar. I guess some guys could profit off of youth camps, etc but all of the HC I worked with paid us for our time and then put the rest back into the program.
Sure. But why do they need to grow (the population of their district) to improve in sports (football specifically)?Areas like Minnetonka and Edina have no where to grow.
I made an assumption that pay of high school head coach was a variable in the metro.Also, mplsgopher - obviously pay? I have coached hs football at a few places - all have had a district contracted salary that have all been very similar. I guess some guys could profit off of youth camps, etc but all of the HC I worked with paid us for our time and then put the rest back into the program.
Speaking of STMA, they may be the last district that I know of that was carved out of pieces of other districts. It happened in the late 60s when the Legislature decided that all school districts had to be K12 instead of K6 or K8Yeah I was surprised STMA got that far. I think South beats Maple Grove, I’m not sure south could stay within 28 points of last years South team.
The Hopkins district is some kind of amalgamation of like 10 or 15 smaller districts, I think!Speaking of STMA, they may be the last district that I know of that was carved out of pieces of other districts. It happened in the late 60s when the Legislature decided that all school districts had to be K12 instead of K6 or K8
There has been a lot more consolidation in the other direction.
School Consolidation - MN House Research
The home page for the nonpartisan Research Department of the Minnesota House of Representatives, providing information on historical school district consolidations.www.house.leg.state.mn.us