PMWinSTP
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2015
- Messages
- 16,289
- Reaction score
- 5,762
- Points
- 113
Would be a top 25 team in that stat.It's a goal at least. I'm hoping for at least 65% which I think is very possible.
Would be a top 25 team in that stat.It's a goal at least. I'm hoping for at least 65% which I think is very possible.
He had time on many plays.I think Brosmer is around 72% so far this season, give or take.
He was over 60% against North Carolina with almost no time to throw.
He had time on many plays.
Would be a top 25 team in that stat.
The 71.5% where he dropped back and wasn't pressured doesn't equate to "many" plays in your book?One of Minnesota's biggest offensive struggles was giving its new quarterbackenough time to throw the football. Brosmer was pressured on 28.5% of his dropbacks and the North Carolina defense got home for five sacks on the night.
Veteran Tar Heels defensive lineman Jahvaree Ritzie was arguably the player of the game, recording six tackles and three sacks. Listed at 6-foot-5 and 290 pounds, Brosmer was running away from him all night.
Minnesota QB Max Brosmer details his 'welcome to the Power 4' moment
Max Brosmer's Gophers debut against North Carolina was his 34th career start as a Division I quarterback, but it was his first against a Power 4 team.www.si.com
The 71.5% where he dropped back and wasn't pressured doesn't equate to "many" plays in your book?
Oh, so you were agreeing that he had time on many plays by responding to that post using the article?I'm sorry, did I say that?
Oh, so you were agreeing that he had time on many plays by responding to that post using the article?
So you agree he had time on many plays, as the poster stated? Yes or No.I posted an article, yes. And yes, I agree with the takes in the article regarding pass protection in the North Carolina game.
So you agree he had time on many plays, as the poster stated? Yes or No.
I consider 71.5% as many plays, like the poster stated. Do you?I agree that he was not pressured on 71.5% of his throws.
In assessing pass protection, do you consider that excellent, good, mediocre, bad...?
I consider 71.5% as many plays, like the poster stated. Do you?
ATT | COMP | COMP-% | INT | TD | YDS | YDS/ATT | TD/ 100 ATT | INT/100 ATT | TD RUSH | NCAA Pass Rtng | |
MORGAN | 1063 | 661 | 62.18% | 32 | 65 | 9,469 | 8.9 | 6.1 | 3.0 | 8 | 151.2 |
BROSMER | 77 | 53 | 68.83% | 1 | 3 | 627 | 8.1 | 3.9 | 1.3 | 1 | 147.5 |
LEIDNER | 1029 | 580 | 56.37% | 32 | 36 | 7,287 | 7.1 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 33 | 121.2 |
KALIAKMANIS | 405 | 216 | 53.33% | 13 | 17 | 2,236 | 5.5 | 4.2 | 3.2 | 3 | 107.1 |
I think he's similar to Morgan in a lot of ways. I actually think Brosmer does a slightly better job of not locking onto receivers like Morgan could do at times. Morgan was maybe slightly more decisive.I realize it's a little premature to say this, but I really like Max Brosmer. He appears to me as a legit Big Ten QB. He throws a nice ball with touch and accuracy. To those in the know, would you say he's in the top half of Big Ten in terms of talent? How would you compare him Tanner so far?
Agreed. Given time, he looks like a very accurate passer who attempts to read the D and find the open man rather than locking on. Very willing to check down, but only after going through his progressions. I like what I’ve seen the past two weeks, but the pass rush is going to be legit moving forward.I realize it's a little premature to say this, but I really like Max Brosmer. He appears to me as a legit Big Ten QB. He throws a nice ball with touch and accuracy. To those in the know, would you say he's in the top half of Big Ten in terms of talent? How would you compare him Tanner so far?