BleedGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 61,982
- Reaction score
- 18,172
- Points
- 113
Go Gophers!!
Coyle is a snake .
He said nothing, in that response, except that he makes the decisions.
Since Lindsay Whalen got 5 years to prove herself, I would be surprised if Ben Johnson gets fired after year two.
But...the snake removed Claeys so he could do anything.
Honest question for you or anyone still hung up on Claeys.....do you really not understand that whole situation? Claeys was never a long term solution he was a stop gap for one year.Coyle is a snake .
He said nothing, in that response, except that he makes the decisions.
Since Lindsay Whalen got 5 years to prove herself, I would be surprised if Ben Johnson gets fired after year two.
But...the snake removed Claeys so he could do anything.
Regarding Claeys, I didn't really have an issue with him being let go but I can still recognize that Coyle acted like an asp in how it was handled.Honest question for you or anyone still hung up on Claeys.....do you really not understand that whole situation? Claeys was never a long term solution he was a stop gap for one year.
Ben will get year 3, beyond that will almost certainly depend on how things are going on and off the court.
Did Coyle know that Fleck was available before Claeys was fired?Honest question for you or anyone still hung up on Claeys.....do you really not understand that whole situation? Claeys was never a long term solution he was a stop gap for one year.
Ben will get year 3, beyond that will almost certainly depend on how things are going on and off the court.
Coyle is both refined and very articulate.Coyle isn't a very refined or articulate person,
Well, he's no David Kahn.Coyle is both refined and very articulate.
I’m sure he did.Did Coyle know that Fleck was available before Claeys was fired?
If that's the case, I think a similar thing should be on the table, he should pull the trigger if he has another rising star basketball coach already committed to take over for CBJ. Unfortunately, I don't one of those on the horizon.
He will never be mistaken for a great orator, and there is probably close to zero chance we'd ever find him proselytizing on a street corner. Just not his schtick.Coyle is bad at speaking and is known for never giving a straight answer. Great AD though.
Yeah, not a ringing endorsement for Ben. That response sounds like something Coyle would have said about Claeys at the end of his season. Coyle's response edited below for Claeys:Wow, that’s not a response you want at end of year 2. If you’re the coach.
I'm not hung up on Claeys. It was how Coyle handled it that was in poor fashion in my opinion. I am a huge PJ fan and was even hoping we would hire him during Claeys' season.Honest question for you or anyone still hung up on Claeys.....do you really not understand that whole situation? Claeys was never a long term solution he was a stop gap for one year.
Ben will get year 3, beyond that will almost certainly depend on how things are going on and off the court.
Maybe Coyle needs to be put on notice. Still operating on the cheap.How's Coyle's fundraising going?
That's a terrible response by Coyle- unless he plans on firing Ben. I think that would be a mistake at this moment. I think Ben and his younger players need another year. If he plans on keeping Ben, he should have said great things about Ben and that he is making progress despite a tough year. An ADs job should be to be all in with a coach until the moment he fires him.
Does anyone know what the "5 pillars" are at the U?
1. MediocrityDoes anyone know what the "5 pillars" are at the U?
Coyle's job is not to give you an answer that you want to hear. If he plans on ditching Ben i'd much rather have that response than "Ben's doing a great job, we believe in him" and fire him a week later. Seriously, such a strange thing to get upset about.
That's a terrible response by Coyle- unless he plans on firing Ben.
Maybe we wait til he makes a decision to hammer the guy as a terrible speaker.Correct. If he's firing him next week, his answer was perfect. If Ben is coming back for next year, his answer was awful. That's what everyone is saying.
Go Gophers!!
Haha, can we just pretend that THAT was his response? You're very good with words, Bleed.I agree with bga1, awful response by Coyle. Coyle had to know this question was coming. And he has to have already made up his mind, so he's either firing Johnson next week or he's letting him come back for Year 3. Assuming the latter, Coyle should have said "listen, the results aren't where I or Coach Johnson expect them. But I believe in Ben. I see how this freshman class is developing, I see how well he's recruiting, I know how much his players love playing for him and I know we will fill The Barn back up, the wins will come and the energy will return."
Instead, Coyle did what Coyle does.
Go Gophers!!
Maybe we wait til he makes a decision to hammer the guy as a terrible speaker.
I didn't listen to Coyle but he's certainly going to put his own job ahead of Johnson's. If getting rid of Johnson will save himself he'd likely, as would most, do it in a heartbeat. That's just the way it is.