Had to drive to a meeting. Heard Brackin. Missed Lou. From what's been said here, I guess I missed the better information.
I always thought Brackin was a decent writer, but I was embarrassed for him during his segment. Barrerio does what he does (as does Gaard), but I thought Brackin would have least provided some semblance of balance in his assessment of the situation instead of a "Maybe I'll be proven wrong."
I was especially mystified by his stance that a grudge between Maturi and the "Save Gopher Football" group has poisoned this whole thing. As someone who has lived through two instances of M Club meddling (Warmath to Stoll and Stoll to Salem), I can see why Maturi would like to keep them at arm's length. Maybe a sit-down with them is in order, but if all that group is going to say is "Hire Trestman!" why bother listening?
I don't have as much of a problem with Trestman as others here, but the fact remains that if he were this great coach, he would have risen up the ranks faster and would have had a head job somewhere other than Canada by now. He may be the next Vince Lombardi, but if he is, pretty much all of football has whiffed on him.
I'm not going to rag on Barreiro and Gaard. They are paid for opinions over news. It's a different story with Brackin.