I would find it very comical if people were to complain saying ,"but it was with Brewster's boys." Brewster couldn't' win with them.
And a "knod" to you, Bob - well said.
Loblaw did all right as far as he went. However, there needs to be a general recognition by Gopher fans that Brewster left Kill with significantly better players than Mason left Brewster. It is not even a debatable proposition. The facts are undeniable. Mason was headed toward an unmitigated disaster with the Gophers because of his poor recruiting classes in 2004, 2005, 2006, and, more than likely, 2007 (if he had kept his job). As far as I am concerned Mason all but gave up after the 2003 season. After that he was already in retirement mode until Bruininks and Maturi recognized it and fired his ass. Fortunately for Mason if hadn't been fired after the 2007 season he would have had even worse teams than Brewster and probably wouldn't have gotten the Gophers to bowl games during the two years Brewster's teams played in bowl games.
Loblaw did all right as far as he went. However, there needs to be a general recognition by Gopher fans that Brewster left Kill with significantly better players than Mason left Brewster. It is not even a debatable proposition. The facts are undeniable. Mason was headed toward an unmitigated disaster with the Gophers because of his poor recruiting classes in 2004, 2005, 2006, and, more than likely, 2007 (if he had kept his job). As far as I am concerned Mason all but gave up after the 2003 season. After that he was already in retirement mode until Bruininks and Maturi recognized it and fired his ass. Fortunately for Mason if hadn't been fired after the 2007 season he would have had even worse teams than Brewster and probably wouldn't have gotten the Gophers to bowl games during the two years Brewster's teams played in bowl games.
Mason would have done good things with Adam Weber.
Loblaw did all right as far as he went. However, there needs to be a general recognition by Gopher fans that Brewster left Kill with significantly better players than Mason left Brewster. It is not even a debatable proposition. The facts are undeniable. Mason was headed toward an unmitigated disaster with the Gophers because of his poor recruiting classes in 2004, 2005, 2006, and, more than likely, 2007 (if he had kept his job). As far as I am concerned Mason all but gave up after the 2003 season. After that he was already in retirement mode until Bruininks and Maturi recognized it and fired his ass. Fortunately for Mason if hadn't been fired after the 2007 season he would have had even worse teams than Brewster and probably wouldn't have gotten the Gophers to bowl games during the two years Brewster's teams played in bowl games.
Go4Broke, this is interesting, but if you want to compare apples to apples, you really need to flesh out Brew's recruits who started at least 1 game for Kill in 2011. You said you rest your case, but I'm not even sure if you're arguing for or against Mason's talent level. Just showing # of starts is mostly irrelevant. Any new coach is going to get the vast majority of his starters from the remaining players - what matters is how good those players are.
I've always thought that Mason did leave a pretty bare cupboard, and I maintain he would've been fired after not going to a bowl game in 2007 if he had remained as coach. That said, a big chunk of talent did leave with Dom Jones, Alex Daniels & 2 other guys who were more depth-type players. Also, Mason would've had all-B1G Greg Jones at LB, who instead went to Michigan St. But I'd still maintain that the team was at a trough in talent when he left. You look at those 03, 04, 05 & 06 classes - no offense to anyone, but the only really strong near-all-B1G players I see there are Dom Barber, Decker, Brinkhaus, Pinnix & Campbell (and that's being pretty loose with near-all-B1G).
It's very hard to compare this talent level with what Brew left Kill. You'd have to break it down position by position - maybe someone could do this, but I don't have the time or inclination.