So do they just want Maturi fired? I'm not thinking any decent coach wants to go into a situation where some former players rallied to get an A.D. fired, that's just bad vibes all around. I just don't see how this can help us get a good coach here, maybe I'm missing something. Like, when they say "input", what do they mean? They can't believe they should have power to tell the A.D. who to hire, do they? That doesn't make sense to me either. Do they just want to be able to tell him the characteristics they believe the next coach should hold? Or the credentials? I'm looking through their site and I just don't see any of that, all I see is bashing.
We talk about Maturi's track record with hiring football coaches. He's hired one. And he bombed. We get it, the guy went into the last process way too rushed (his own doing of course), and without the legitimate time to consider all options. Plus, there was probably a tad too much emphasis on recruiting, which I don't totally blame him for since we were gettin killed in that dept. Using the same search firm isn't gonna be an issue as long as we got more people involved (Pres, regents more involved than last hire is my impression), and also more money, which is probably the most important. You don't get much for a little more than a mil. But when you drop $2.5 mil, you're gonna get someone pretty good. This hiring process is much different than the previous one IMO.