Everyone is saying Seantrel is a USC lean

Donate To GopherHole
ChemEGopher

ChemEGopher

Section 133 Row 28!!!!!!!!!!!!
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
993
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Every blogger on ESPN that is. As is Charley Walters. Man that would be a huge mistake.
 



Whether it's Minnesota, USC or Ohio State, any of those three and he'll play at TCF Bank Stadium next season.

Go Gophers!!
 

I can understand going to tOSU. Going to USC with Kiffin there is just because it sounds glamorous. If he goes there (or Notre Dame), I just might vomit.
 


GophersInIowa said:
I'd rather he go to USC than Ohio St.
Click to expand...

I would too, but I think it would be a mistake for him personally. There's no telling what kind of sanctions the NCAA will place on USC in the near future.
 

Everyone is saying Seantrel is a USC lean

Every blogger on ESPN that is
Click to expand...

I've heard that all morning too...not a great way to start the day' Hopefully Mr. Henderson proves them all wrong and heads here!
 

ChemEGopher said:
I would too, but I think it would be a mistake for him personally.
Click to expand...

You should let him know that. Then who to hire as an agent in three years. Then the day he wants to propose to that special gal, he could get your advice on that as well. I'm sure you have ideas for baby names for the Hendersons. Where to live once his football career is over?
 

Gopherocious said:
I've heard that all morning too...not a great way to start the day' Hopefully Mr. Henderson proves them all wrong and heads here!
Click to expand...

USC would be a HUGE mistake. Seriously, the coach had to get police protection to get out of Tennesee, he had assistant coaches holding back players he recruited from pummeling him at his last meeting. He has hired "escorts" to recruit, has a history of badmouthing HS kids unless they committ, and literally is the biggest POS in college football. WHY WOULD ANY RECRUIT OR RECRUIT'S PARENTS want to play for him? If he commits to USC, I'm sorry but there has to be under the table money or bribes involved. I'm sorry for saying it, but it has to be true. There's literally no sane reason to do it otherwise.
 



remember this

Mr Henderson is making the decision not his son. His Son wants to go to Minnesota. I will feel sorry for Seantrel if he goes to LA. He will get eaten alive as Kiffin will too. Their deal is over and reality is just around the corner. The kid still could come through for us.
 

gopherjay said:
Mr Henderson is making the decision not his son. His Son wants to go to Minnesota. I will feel sorry for Seantrel if he goes to LA. He will get eaten alive as Kiffin will too. Their deal is over and reality is just around the corner. The kid still could come through for us.
Click to expand...

A lot of your posts (which were later proven correct) seemed to come from some sort of inside info. Is what you say in the bolded above sourced information? Or are you just saying it off the top of your head?

If it is the former, I will commence fapping immediately. If the latter, please don't tease us like that. If you didn't already know this, your posts are given more credence than most.
 

gopherjay said:
Mr Henderson is making the decision not his son. His Son wants to go to Minnesota. I will feel sorry for Seantrel if he goes to LA. He will get eaten alive as Kiffin will too. Their deal is over and reality is just around the corner. The kid still could come through for us.
Click to expand...

+1,000,000

This is reality.
 

Honestly...

USC would be a HUGE mistake. Seriously, the coach had to get police protection to get out of Tennesee, he had assistant coaches holding back players he recruited from pummeling him at his last meeting. He has hired "escorts" to recruit, has a history of badmouthing HS kids unless they committ, and literally is the biggest POS in college football. WHY WOULD ANY RECRUIT OR RECRUIT'S PARENTS want to play for him? If he commits to USC, I'm sorry but there has to be under the table money or bribes involved. I'm sorry for saying it, but it has to be true. There's literally no sane reason to do it otherwise.
Click to expand...

Lane Kiffin speaks in hyperbole, makes statements that are clearly false and does not have an exceptional record as a head coach on any level. Who else does that sound like? Who took a helicopter around the state preaching the wonders of the University of Minnesota? I am sorry for being controversial here but Brewster fits the Kiffin model to a certain degree. I would enjoy seeing the proof that Henderson is being bribed to play at USC? USC does have a strong history and as you know enjoyed immense success this decade in football. For the record, I would not like Henderson to attend USC and would much rather have him in the big10 conference.
 



Ole said:
If he commits to USC, I'm sorry but there has to be under the table money or bribes involved. I'm sorry for saying it, but it has to be true. There's literally no sane reason to do it otherwise.
Click to expand...

More displays of brilliant logic!

no sane reason to play college football for USC?
 

gopherjay said:
Mr Henderson is making the decision not his son. His Son wants to go to Minnesota. I will feel sorry for Seantrel if he goes to LA. He will get eaten alive as Kiffin will too. Their deal is over and reality is just around the corner. The kid still could come through for us.
Click to expand...

LOL! Keep telling yourself this.
 

Seantrel is his own man, his choice will be his.

Parents have influence no doubt about that but make no mistake it will be his "own" decision. I doubt and seriously doubt that anyone is going to make the choice for him, not even his dad who will get all of the credit if he goes to USC. I can see all of the badmouthing already, if he goes elsewhere and all of the "told" you so's if he come's here. Ultimately he know's what's best for him and you have to respect that even if we end up being disappointed.
 

Ole said:
USC would be a HUGE mistake. Seriously, the coach had to get police protection to get out of Tennesee, he had assistant coaches holding back players he recruited from pummeling him at his last meeting. He has hired "escorts" to recruit, has a history of badmouthing HS kids unless they committ, and literally is the biggest POS in college football. WHY WOULD ANY RECRUIT OR RECRUIT'S PARENTS want to play for him? If he commits to USC, I'm sorry but there has to be under the table money or bribes involved. I'm sorry for saying it, but it has to be true. There's literally no sane reason to do it otherwise.
Click to expand...

On the Heard, he made an analogy about how your kids like the music you hate. They'll like it even more if you hate it more!
 

Ole said:
USC would be a HUGE mistake. Seriously, the coach had to get police protection to get out of Tennesee, he had assistant coaches holding back players he recruited from pummeling him at his last meeting. He has hired "escorts" to recruit, has a history of badmouthing HS kids unless they committ, and literally is the biggest POS in college football. WHY WOULD ANY RECRUIT OR RECRUIT'S PARENTS want to play for him? If he commits to USC, I'm sorry but there has to be under the table money or bribes involved. I'm sorry for saying it, but it has to be true. There's literally no sane reason to do it otherwise.
Click to expand...

did you ever think that the school and not the coach is the reason he may pick USC? I would hope that any kid does not make this choice based on a any coach who may or may not be there the whole 4 years.

USC is a good academic school, has a long and proud football tradtion and has many other things to offer than a football coach. And before you start bashing this is coming from someone that went to Minnesota.
 

On the flip side if I say he is a Minnesota lean, can I break the logic of the title of this thread and therefore throw the recruiting process into a tizzy?
 

Simple question? If you are a top 10 recruit and want to have the most success on a team and/or personally where would you go? USC, where just in this decade they have been an NFL factory and won multiple national championships or Minnesota where the last 40 years of football has been average at best? Not much of a debate in my opinion.
 

PapaHawk21 said:
Lane Kiffin speaks in hyperbole, makes statements that are clearly false and does not have an exceptional record as a head coach on any level. Who else does that sound like? Who took a helicopter around the state preaching the wonders of the University of Minnesota? I am sorry for being controversial here but Brewster fits the Kiffin model to a certain degree. I would enjoy seeing the proof that Henderson is being bribed to play at USC? USC does have a strong history and as you know enjoyed immense success this decade in football. For the record, I would not like Henderson to attend USC and would much rather have him in the big10 conference.
Click to expand...

You couldn't be more wrong.

Kiffin is marginally experienced. Brewster has been a coach for more than 20 years. He was a coach when Kiffin was still in high school.

Kiffin gets by on his contacts. Brewster gets by on his own abilities (his apparent lack of a network even seems to be a hindrance to him here).

Kiffin has burned bridges everywhere he has gone. Brewster is well-liked by most that have met him in person, as cited here.

Kiffin was handed perhaps the premier college football job in America on the basis of a very weak resumé. You could say the same for Brewster (that he didn't earn his position), but he is at a much lower-level school, and he put in his dues for decades.

Kiffin has been cited for numerous violations, recruiting and otherwise. Brewster has been cited zero times for any violations of any kind.

The only thing Brewster and Kiffin have in common is that they both like to talk. Otherwise, they couldn't be more different.

Thanks for the input though, Mr. "Zero National Championships" dickhead.

Try harder.
 

worst thread ever. USC is a top 3 program and SH has a chance to be starting when he comes back to TCF.

As someone who lives in SoCal and hates the Trojans, they are the Kings of Cali and SH will be a BMOC immediately...I laugh at you people thinking you know more than others...get over yourselves.
 

Haha the national championship argument, I always enjoy that one. When was the last gopher Jan.1 Bowl game? 1967? How about that Rose Bowl after two seasons? How about zero rivalry wins or bowl wins? Kiffin payed his dues for a head coaching position with his success at USC as an assistant. Brewster earned his opportunity as well and they both make outlandish statements and false statements that are truly laughable. Brewster claimed that he had 113 wins as a coach at one point on his blog, if that is not arrogant and plagiarism of others then I do not know what is. Even as an Iowa fan, I hope Brewster can help Minnesota's program turn the corner because it is better for the big10 but Brewster is not an icon for integrity or honesty either.
 

PapaHawk21 said:
Lane Kiffin speaks in hyperbole, makes statements that are clearly false and does not have an exceptional record as a head coach on any level. Who else does that sound like? Who took a helicopter around the state preaching the wonders of the University of Minnesota? I am sorry for being controversial here but Brewster fits the Kiffin model to a certain degree. I would enjoy seeing the proof that Henderson is being bribed to play at USC? USC does have a strong history and as you know enjoyed immense success this decade in football. For the record, I would not like Henderson to attend USC and would much rather have him in the big10 conference.
Click to expand...

Honestly, that was dishonest. Either your making stuff up, or you don't follow Minnesota football enough to know better. Kiffin and Brewster have one thing in common, they are both salesman. However, Kiffin has numerous NCAA violations and has publicly bad mouthed opposing coaches, players and his staff. Brewster has done none of these.
 

Look, all I'm saying is Kiffin is a slimeball, his presence should negate the fine tradition of the school.
USC under Carroll no brainer.

As for the Hawk troll, Brew is overly positive, prone to grand statements, but he's not slimy, sorry he's just not. Now why don't you crawl back to a mudhole Ioweeee forum somewhere and discuss your own damn team.
 

PapaHawk21 said:
Haha the national championship argument, I always enjoy that one. When was the last gopher Jan.1 Bowl game? 1967? How about that Rose Bowl after two seasons? How about zero rivalry wins or bowl wins? Kiffin payed his dues for a head coaching position with his success at USC as an assistant. Brewster earned his opportunity as well and they both make outlandish statements and false statements that are truly laughable. Brewster claimed that he had 113 wins as a coach at one point on his blog, if that is not arrogant and plagiarism of others then I do not know what is. Even as an Iowa fan, I hope Brewster can help Minnesota's program turn the corner because it is better for the big10 but Brewster is not an icon for integrity or honesty either.
Click to expand...

Funny how Iowa and Wisconsin fans always invoke some variation of the "national championships won long ago don't mean anything" argument. Fans of teams that actually have national championships don't need to do this. I've never once heard fans of Michigan, Ohio St, Penn St, etc. marginalize Minnesota's national championships. Interesting.

Also, the majority of this last post was basically just reiterating exactly what I typed. Thanks for the reinforcement!

Further, find me even one non-USC or non-Kiffin fan who thinks Kiffin has put in the appropriate amount of work to even be considered for the USC head job, let alone be hired for it, and I'll give you credit. Since you can't, this is just another thing you're wrong about.
 

Just to clear up the OP. I think it would be a huge mistake for SH to go to USC over any of the schools on his list, not just MN. Why go to the school when with pending sanctions and a slimeball coach when you can go to any other national power or the hometown school? OSU, Florida, ND, Miami would all be better choices than USC. He'll be the BMOC anywhere he goes.
 

ChemEGopher said:
I would too, but I think it would be a mistake for him personally. There's no telling what kind of sanctions the NCAA will place on USC in the near future.
Click to expand...

Is USC gonna get hammered or let off the hook? I wouldn't risk it. That's a possible loss of postsesason play and nationally televised games. Why take that chance? USC is considered to be guilty of egregious offenses. It doesn't do any good to go undefeated is you aren't ranked, aren't seen, and don't play in during Bowl Season.
 

AhliBobwa said:
Is USC gonna get hammered or let off the hook? I wouldn't risk it. That's a possible loss of postsesason play and nationally televised games. Why take that chance? USC is considered to be guilty of egregious offenses. It doesn't do any good to go undefeated is you aren't ranked, aren't seen, and don't play in during Bowl Season.
Click to expand...

The easy, d*uchey thing to say is something along the lines of "it's better to be banned from postseason play than to not be able to make it there in the first place."

Just thought I'd beat the trolls to it.
 


You must log in or register to reply here.



Top Bottom