Could be a troll, could be telling the truth. I didn't see it but I will tell U this. When I told my wife that Clayes was fired she said she saw that coming. I asked why. She replied, "do u remember the night he was hired and the next few days how in is interviews I told u he talked too much??" I said yes. She said, "well there u go. He wanted to say too much all the time when he just should keep his mouth shut."
I guess she was right. He should have never got on Twitter. LOL
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If anyone wants to take a listen, link below. Never been a fan of him, and after listening, def doesn't change my opinion of him. He's just, not a head coach/ face of a program/franchise type of guy....
http://www.espn.com/espnradio/play?id=18414087
Tracy may be a good x's and o's coach but he is severely lacking when it comes to putting himself in a positive light. If the tweet wasn't enough he goes on OTL today and probably thinks he is going to be praised since Kill defended him yesterday, but instead looks uncomfortable and unprepared and gets grilled by the female anchor (not Bob Ley) and admits that he never read the report before the tweet. Pretty much exposes that he didn't take command of his own program and let someone else (Coyle-Kaler) fill the void he left by sitting on his hands. You would think on a day when the U of M is likely to announce something in regard to the new coach that Tracy going on OTL would be bad, but it only made them look better.
Tracy would be wise to take a long vacation where he disconnects from all technology.
Listened..he was pretty good and very fair about the whole process. You must be seriously thin skinned and insecure to be negative about the interview.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Really..interesting because I listened to it and he came off well. Ironically I turned on Dan B. on Kfan and they were talking about what he said and for the most part agreed with 90% of his talking points.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Among other things, Mr. Claeys said this: "I've seen some of these from just in recruiting and looking at transfer kids -- that some of the things that are put on these transcripts when these kids go through these investigations, they have no chance. And there was never any type of criminal charges filed against them, and when schools get these and see what's on them in the admissions, they're really -- they're hampering these kids for life."
I'm not sure about this, but for anything like what Claeys describes to appear on a student's transcript, I think it would violate the Family Educational Rights And Privacy Act (FERPA). Frankly, I'd be very surprised if he has seen anything on a transcript like what he says he has seen.
Why would he lie about it.. he has no reason, especially on a national televised show. That's a ridiculous take.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Isn't nuance French for "bullsh*t"
Why yes that's why the quotation marks..
Now what does bullsh*t mean.
Among other things, Mr. Claeys said this: "I've seen some of these from just in recruiting and looking at transfer kids -- that some of the things that are put on these transcripts when these kids go through these investigations, they have no chance. And there was never any type of criminal charges filed against them, and when schools get these and see what's on them in the admissions, they're really -- they're hampering these kids for life."
For anything like what Claeys describes to appear on a student's transcript, would it violate the Family Educational Rights And Privacy Act (FERPA)?
Among other things, Mr. Claeys said this: "I've seen some of these from just in recruiting and looking at transfer kids -- that some of the things that are put on these transcripts when these kids go through these investigations, they have no chance. And there was never any type of criminal charges filed against them, and when schools get these and see what's on them in the admissions, they're really -- they're hampering these kids for life."
For anything like what Claeys describes to appear on a student's transcript, would it violate the Family Educational Rights And Privacy Act (FERPA)?
Among other things, Mr. Claeys said this: "I've seen some of these from just in recruiting and looking at transfer kids -- that some of the things that are put on these transcripts when these kids go through these investigations, they have no chance. And there was never any type of criminal charges filed against them, and when schools get these and see what's on them in the admissions, they're really -- they're hampering these kids for life."
For anything like what Claeys describes to appear on a student's transcript, would it violate the Family Educational Rights And Privacy Act (FERPA)?
It's almost certainly true. First of all Claey's does not violate FERPA. Whose privacy has he compromised? It's no different than the U saying, "Yes, we've kicked people out for Title IX violations."
Also, when a student is expelled after a Title IX investigation, their transcript often gets a notation alluding that the expulsion was due to a Title IX type violation. It's one of the biggest problems with the 'system'. It's basically a scarlet letter that generally precludes re-enrollment at another college. It's basically the whole reason due process similar to a criminal proceeding is warranted for such serious accusations. The college is doing more than expelling the student, they are giving them a punishment that follows them long after they've left the school. Seems like you'd wanna get that one right.
It's also powerfully ironic that this is a 'progressive' approach. We have liberal groups like the Innocence Project that basically go around and get new trials for people they feel are wrongfully convicted in a court where the burden of proof is 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. Even in a system with a high burden of proof, due process and checks and balances, they believe the wrong decision is often reached.
...But life changing sexual assault decisions made on a mere 'more likely than not' burden by non-legal professionals? We'll just assume they get all those right.
It does not go on the transcript of the University of Minnesota. It has been discussed but not ever implemented as policy. Either that, or the Bursar's office lied to me.
Oh well it's just a couple n******....
Um....what?!?
Honest question; does it matter? All they have to do is goggle the players name. Anytime these players names are mentioned publicly, sexual assault allegations will accompany them. Regardless of point of view, every person on this board has background information on how we arrived here. That won't be the case for 99% of the folks who are casual fans or no fan and just reading the paper/article/blog.
In addition, most admission offices, coaches, hiring leaders, etc are not going to want to mess with that. 10 years from now when these young men are meeting significant others and their families; they will have to explain this. Add in the firing of a D1 head coach and staff in his first season with a 9-4 record and a bowl win; folks will be thinking they must have a GREAT reason to fire the coach right? The players must be guilty.... right?
To come full circle; real talk....if I'm interviewing candidates for a position and I google their name (I always google) and this comes up. If I have other candidates of similar (not better just close) interview results............
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk