Sportsfan24
Active member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2009
- Messages
- 12,686
- Reaction score
- 9
- Points
- 36
This is kind of an aggressive "us against them" mentality isn't it? Doesn't that kind of message breed divisiveness?
In regards to Tony Dungy- didn't he already have an NFL HC job before the Rooney Rule? His teams were known for great defense, but lack luster offenses. He brought the Bucs back to respectability, but kind of hit a plateau of making the playoffs, but not being able to get further than first round or so. Is it a coincidence that he was picked up by a team that already had a good offense, but needed shoring up on D? Was he fired because he was black, and then hired by the Colts because he was black(Rooney Rule)? Or was he fired from the Bucs because his offenses were bad and had reached a plateau, and hired by the Colts because they already had an offense and needed some Defense?
Rooney did not need a rule to do the right thing, his fellow owners did. Dungy was great coach who took a perennial horrible team to the playoffs. He was fired and Gruden was the beneficiary one year later.
Because he was a great coach, Dungy built perennial loser Indy into a Super Bowl winner.
Us against them mentality? Is that what you call being self sufficient and resolving ones own issues. What's your take on black coaches not being hired? What is your solution?