BigTen Regular Season Champions Vs. OSU

Ignatius L Hoops

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 9, 2015
Messages
9,263
Reaction score
2,150
Points
113
What a strange first period. There were some nifty looking non-goal efforts and then the two penalties on the goalie. I don't recall seeing that in a gopher game. I recall a Badger goalie getting a misconduct and having to sit in the box; but not two penalties in a period. Anyway, the interference call was a classic and added some juice to the proceedings.

Man, Faber crashing the net was a great way to kick off the scoring
 

bleedsmaroonandgold

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Messages
6,414
Reaction score
1,054
Points
113
Didn't get a chance to watch, but sounds like goalie kicking the net off was an issue. That gets called so rarely, I'd almost rather the rule change so it is an automatic penalty if a goalie knocks the net off without any contact from another player. Kind of like the defenseman shooting the puck over the glass without a delflection in the NHL: doesn't matter if it was on purpose, you just need to not do it otherwise you get a penalty.
 


BTChamp

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2019
Messages
5,384
Reaction score
4,730
Points
113
Over/Under on timing of the first "kick the net off".
 




From the Parkinglot

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 6, 2011
Messages
4,178
Reaction score
2,169
Points
113
Those are not good hits by snuggerud and Knies. Snuggy could be 5. Knies was high.

Of course it was a big missed call at center ice on Jimmy when he was cross checked right to the head. That lead to all of this.
 


From the Parkinglot

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 6, 2011
Messages
4,178
Reaction score
2,169
Points
113
Those seem like the right calls. The refs just can’t miss the play 45 seconds earlier that lead to everything.
 



bonin21

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 4, 2014
Messages
2,040
Reaction score
898
Points
113
Yikes, two fives that will both get investigated.
 










BTChamp

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2019
Messages
5,384
Reaction score
4,730
Points
113
He's talking about 81 and 89 after the fives are done
Never mind, yes I misunderstood. I thought it was about can they come back after a goal. I'm a little slow............
 

From the Parkinglot

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 6, 2011
Messages
4,178
Reaction score
2,169
Points
113
Ya, not sure why both are still in the game but part of it could be for the sake of the fans...

1 goal on that PP is almost guaranteed. Key will be keeping it to 1
I thought 89 would for sure get 5 and a game. 81 was more questionable and maybe should not have been a 5, but was for sure a penalty. Refs realized they needed to put a lid on things before they got out of control and this was their opportunity. Not that 81 and 89 didn’t earn both penalties.
 

DarrenTheGreek

Gov. Victory Bell Ringer
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
3,111
Reaction score
1,287
Points
113
Here we thought OSU would goon it up. Gotta be smarter than that.
 


BTChamp

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2019
Messages
5,384
Reaction score
4,730
Points
113
4 seconds away from giving up 0 goals.
 

bonin21

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 4, 2014
Messages
2,040
Reaction score
898
Points
113
We are looking for regulation wins in the race against Qpac, not OT squeakers anymore.
 



From the Parkinglot

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 6, 2011
Messages
4,178
Reaction score
2,169
Points
113
Gophers seems to be more interested in hitting and chirping then they do just playing their game.
 








Top Bottom