fmlizard
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2012
- Messages
- 6,853
- Reaction score
- 8,406
- Points
- 113
You are pretty cynical, I say Claeys tweet means what it says, he supports his players, in situations like this you go with your gut, you don't sell out those that work with or for you, those that are you friends, you support them regardless of what the consensus is, I applaud the players for doing what they believe is right and I am 100% behind whatever they decide.
There are things that are more important than a football team, player, or season, if you are on the wrong side then there are those that should suffer the consequences, but that doesn't mean you don't support them.
There is more going on here than meets the eye, my guess is both the female student and football players are victims, as it is playing out probably on equal footings.
I agree. Coach Claeys is in an impossible spot here and it's really unfair to him. If he shows support for his players, he is seen in conflict with admin and to condone sexual misconduct (not that it necessarily happened). If he shows support for admin and speaks against the boycott, he loses the team and tanks his recruiting for now and years to come. If he is silent, the silence from the head coach becomes deafening and we're all wondering why he doesn't lead.
My guess is that Coach Claeys really does think these guys are being railroaded, especially the newly named players who didn't even make sexual contact, so if he's going to go down for something it may as well be what he believes in.
But he also didn't call some big press conference or issue a real statement yet, so he's trying to be as quiet as he can to this point. Which is probably good.