Thanks? I'm not a writer, so don't care. I thought my point was clear.Unless GW is doing a really impressive act, you could not be him, your writing style is terrible. Really bad. 3rd Grade level at best.
Thanks? I'm not a writer, so don't care. I thought my point was clear.Unless GW is doing a really impressive act, you could not be him, your writing style is terrible. Really bad. 3rd Grade level at best.
Thanks? I'm not a writer, so don't care. I thought my point was clear.
Anyone have an answer for me?My question, the people calling for a PG do you expect Tubby to get a decent PG in the Spring?
Tonite was further evidence that Mav and Chip are not D1 players and need to move on. Welch is too slow to play PG and cannot shoot FTs which means a PG needs to be recruited for next year. There are undoubtedly PGs not yet signed. If Dre goes down it will be Al Nolen 2.0 again with no one to handle the ball much less provide effective PG play.
One can call it lack of coaching, mundane play calling, bad exectution, but in the end of any big ten games the defense will pick up, the refs swallow their wistle and the teams that have players, especially guards, who are quick, strong, and skilled will bring their teams to victory.
Ya this is what I was thinking. I just looked at Rivals for guards from Minnesota, and Woodard is the only good one that's uncommitted. I just don't get how guys that bash Tubby's spring recruiting and think he needs to stop doing it also say he needs to bring in a PG this spring.Woodard is projected as a wing, like Coleman. I don't know if Lockett could play the point any better. Great strong wing also. Chambers might have been a pure pg, not sure if he is high big ten though.
7 of the top 50 2012 PGs on ESPN are unsigned. I would bet most would jump at the chance to play meaningful minutes on B1G team like the Gophers. Dump Mav and Chip and sign one.
Dump Mav and Chip and sign one.
Box.zambam said:Anyway, back on topic:
Anyone have an answer for me?
So if the board concludes there's no one new who can be brought in
Link? I can't find it.
Where did Chambers rank on that list?
I only see 15 PG that are on the ESPN 2012 TOP100 & it appears all of them are signed. You think this guy will be a better option than Andre or Welch?
Go to ESPN NCAA BB, then recruiting nation, then database, then click on PG. There is 1 3 star and the rest are 2 stars. These are not top 150 players.
7 of the top 50 2012 PGs on ESPN are unsigned. I would bet most would jump at the chance to play meaningful minutes on B1G team like the Gophers. Dump Mav and Chip and sign one.
The 7 I mentioned are rated higher than Chambers including the 20th rated, Dewayne Russell from Peoria, AZ who has interest from USC amongst others. These guys probably have high opinions of themselves.
Go to ESPN NCAA BB, then recruiting nation, then database, then click on PG. There is 1 3 star and the rest are 2 stars. These are not top 150 players.
What PGs do we have offered (recruiting/watching) for 2013?
I agree with bga and Costa. A ** freshman PG will not help. Did Cobbs really look like a good prospect to anyone as a freshman here? I didn't think so. Dre's development was exceptional.
[B]The program has to send clear message to Tyus that MN wants to build around him[/B]. That's one of MN's best arguments to him as contrasted with MSU, where Izzy has feelers out for another top prospect at PG named JaQuan Lyle (****, but not offered according to ESPN), or Duke, where you are a mere cog. It's 'pointless' to bring in a rent-a-PG, which has already been tried unsuccessfully.