Texan Gopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2022
- Messages
- 531
- Reaction score
- 1,038
- Points
- 93
Can you imagine PJ going to Arkansas and taking Drake with him ?
I don’t think hiring an FCS coach is on its face badI'm not going to be too worried about it unless PJ actually left, which I don't think he will.
I just think if you're looking for the next Cignetti, Polasek could have as good of a chance as anyone.
I'm sure Bo Pelini would pick up the phone lolI don’t think hiring an FCS coach is on its face bad
Tressel was an FCS coach that Ohio state hired
What if LSU takes our President, AD, and HC?Can you imagine PJ going to Arkansas and taking Drake with him ?
As I’m sure Curt Cignetti was to all but the most hardcore IU fans (all 12 of them at the time) when he was hired in 2023.I think that would be very underwhelming to a lot of fans.
I wouldn’t consider him an FCs hireI'm sure Bo Pelini would pick up the phone lol
I would take Kleiman. Physical, power football.I wouldn’t consider him an FCs hire
But I’m sure he would
SDSU was an old guy for a while.
Would you rather have:
Chris Kleiman
Matt Entz
Or
Tim Polesek
I think I’d pick Entz
I don’t think hiring an FCS coach is on its face bad
Tressel was an FCS coach that Ohio state hired
Can you imagine PJ going to Arkansas and taking Drake with him ?
The only reason he doesn’t recruit those players is because he can’t get them at Minnesota.If PJ left, I don't ever see him going to the SEC. His style/program doesn't exactly fit in the SEC and for the type of players they recruit.
As I’m sure Curt Cignetti was to all but the most hardcore IU fans (all 12 of them at the time) when he was hired in 2023.
The only reason he doesn’t recruit those players is because he can’t get them at Minnesota.
This is the stuff that bothers me, we have plenty of players that are here only due to football. And there’s nothing wrong with that. Quit pretending that because our results aren’t high end, that we don’t bend the academic rules in our favor.Yeah you’re right, he’s not getting players that aren’t here to play school
Link?This is the stuff that bothers me, we have plenty of players that are here only due to football. And there’s nothing wrong with that. Quit pretending that because our results aren’t high end, that we don’t bend the academic rules in our favor.
How is it damning?Link?
That’s a pretty damning statement.
Your implication is that we've recruited players who are good athletes but academically inept and that we've bent the rules to keep them on the field. There's zero evidence of that occurring over Fleck's tenure, quite the opposite actually.How is it damning?
This is the stuff that bothers me, we have plenty of players that are here only due to football. And there’s nothing wrong with that. Quit pretending that because our results aren’t high end, that we don’t bend the academic rules in our favor.
"Who's Rowing the Boat? We Are!"One of the more astute things I've ever read on GH. One component I would add: From the school's perspective, RTB doesn't really fly if they have their own established brand. PJ isn't getting the Penn State job, but can you imagine "We Are. Row the Boat."?! Of course not.
I think this means that if Fleck is going to be offered a job that the majority of observers would regard as "better" than Minnesota, it will mean the end of RTB. I have a hard time believing he'd do that, but perhaps it's become a Catch-22. He thinks RTB and using it as a way to create a life program is the best way to run a program, but the better jobs won't integrate RTB into their brand.
Drake would go with him, if Fleck went there. There is absolutely zero doubt.Can you imagine PJ going to Arkansas and taking Drake with him ?
I would guess he’d follow him to Arkansas, but would he follow him anywhere else?Drake would go with him, if Fleck went there. There is absolutely zero doubt.
The doubt is entirely on if he would go there or not.
I could imagine it, if they offered him $10M/year. And if they would offer Fleck that, then they'd offer any coach that.
The question for Fleck would be: what is the point? I don't think you can compete for a SEC title, let alone a national title, at Arkansas any easier than you can a Big Ten title and natty at Minnesota.
Maybe you could get a few more players there. But to what end?
That's a more interesting question, for sureI would guess he’d follow him to Arkansas, but would he follow him anywhere else?
If you can’t get it done at KSU, not sure he could get it done here.I would take Kleiman. Physical, power football.
K State isn’t close to as good a job as ours.If you can’t get it done at KSU, not sure he could get it done here.
Really? Outside of b12 not as prolific as b10 I think it’s just as good.K State isn’t close to as good a job as ours.
Iowa fans would riot. I don't see Illinois either. Michigan and ND are the two he'd leave for in a hot minute.I’d worry about him going to Iowa or Illinois actually
Not even close. Historically close but not in today’s world with the B10 money and profile, et al.Really? Outside of b12 not as prolific as b10 I think it’s just as good.
I was joking in my original post about Lindsey going to Arkansas and bringing Fleck with him, but it is the only way Fleck ends up at Arkansas.Maybe you were going for humor, but no way you hire a head coach to get a QB.
That said, if Fleck did go to Arkansas it would be a near certainty that Lindsey would go with him.
Iowa fans would riot. I don't see Illinois either. Michigan and ND are the two he'd leave for in
OkIowa fans would riot. I don't see Illinois either. Michigan and ND are the two he'd leave for in a hot minute.