The problem for us is that the top kids want it all if they can get it:Sure, but you dont think KU/Tex/Ore/MD werent also recruiting other guys hard at his position? Again, a ton of props to the staff, they have absolutely targeted some under the radar kids who blew up, that is a spectacular sign of a good staff. But to just totally disregard that its not good that despite a visit and early interest he doesnt have us on his list at all is not right either. You can say there are people on here who are only negative, which is true, but you do not seem to want to every acknowledge any misstep this staff makes. Part of recruiting is finding the players, the other part is convincing a kid who might not have a ton of initial interest to change their mind and consider us. We appear to have been acing step 1 of that, but step 2 has clearly not come to fruition yet. I understand its early but that needs to improve.
1.Winning record for the program
2.Coaching staff relationship
3. Coaching staff track record
4. Facilities
5. Campus setting/weather/surroundings
6. Post grad opportunity
We can check some of the boxes if our coaches build a great relationship. The facilities are solid- other than the fact that the kids might not get the Barn. Weather is tough and the campus setting is urban- some will like that and some not. Post grad opportunities are good here. The obvious issues are #1, #3 and for some #5. Until more of those are solved, getting kids under the radar and developing them better than other do is going to have to be the ticket.