BleedGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 61,969
- Reaction score
- 18,155
- Points
- 113
Go Gophers!!
Agree with Doogie on this one. Mayor or no Mayor at ISU, Gophers aren't getting Coffey. Pitino likely has caught that drift from the Coffey family, and has moved on accordingly.
Agree with Doogie on this one. Mayor or no Mayor at ISU, Gophers aren't getting Coffey. Pitino likely has caught that drift from the Coffey family, and has moved on accordingly.
It is very difficult to get elite players period. especially when the program itself has had virtually no meaningful success. 2-3 conference titles in a 100 years is very mediocre. So many kids want a successful school with a successful coach, college town, better climate etc.. However, the hopes of building a strong program lie in first hiring the right coach and then finding undervalued kids that you build a relationship with, that you identified as having a mental toughness that can withstand early losing. Frank Mason is a great example. FIND 4-6 Mason types and find out if Pitino can coach. This is how you build a winner. The huge challenge is always going to be finding that rare special coach. If there are 330 schools then perhaps 30 or so have one of those rare coaches. Hopefully UM has one in Pitino but he has a way to go to prove it. By year 4 if you do not have a top 5 conference team then history has the strong suggestion that he does not have that something special.Coffey does not make or break anything. He has some serious questions himself that will take time to answer.
What makes you say that? Playing the odds or are there rumors? (other than Doogie)
I know many disagree, but I do believe long term competitiveness of the program is closely linked to keeping the best local players close to home.
Common sense.
1. The program needs to get to a certain spot where the truly elite Minnesota kids want to come here. We're nowhere near that. That's Richard's #1 task right now. Do that -- start producing winning B1G seasons and consistent NCAA bids (see our neighbors to the East) -- and they will (start to) come.
2. Amir's father played for Clem. Richard Coffey has always spoken highly of Clem, waht he did for him as a player & helping him turn into a man. Amir's father and Clem are tight. Despite going to school there, the University of Minnesota probably is more likely on Richard C's "naughty" list than his "nice" list.
I agree it would be highly beneficial to get our share of the truly elite Minnesota kids to stay home (i.e. Humphries, Jacobson, Jones, Przybilla, Rickert, Travis, Vaughn, etc.), but to do that the first step is producing legitimate signs the program is headed for something much bigger and better. If it takes mostly out-of-state recruits to start getting us to that point, I'm fine with that.
In regards to your first and third point, I think the football program is another good example of that. We've had a couple of nice seasons and appear to be heading in the right direction, and lo and behold, we're getting a lot more of the top in state recruits than we're missing, even breaking the 'elite' bubble with Coughlin.
Agree with Doogie on this one. Mayor or no Mayor at ISU, Gophers aren't getting Coffey. Pitino likely has caught that drift from the Coffey family, and has moved on accordingly.
Let me start by saying I really really want Amir here.
However, how many out of state recruits have we signed over their "home school" ? Guys like Mason, Dorsey, etc. I think sometimes guys just like to go to school elsewhere. Not really an indication on the coach at all to me provided he is getting talent from elsewhere and winning.
As fans the MN kids are more fun, but winning trumps all of that and you don't have any better chance of winning if the kid is from MN or NY.
Coffey's and Trent's lack of home pride is exactly why Pitino and Kimani's eastcoast pipeline is so important. NYC, DC, Baltimore, all of the east coast prep schools, etc. will have better talent than Minnesota just about every single year. If we can establish that pipeline, keeping the in-state kids will be much less critical.
If Amir had home town pride he would have committed the second our number of open 2016 scholarships hit 1. Especially with the way Ponds is expressing interest. Hurt didn't even need to wait that long to show he was committed to the home state program. Coffey not doing so shows he is looking for a reason to get away, just like Tyus, Vaughn, Illikainen and Travis Reid. Which is totally fine, it's his choice. But that's why it's important to develop that east coast pipeline.Who says Coffey has a lack of home town pride? And isn't Trent like 16 years old? Yeesh...
If Amir had home town pride he would have committed the second our number of open 2016 scholarships hit 1. Especially with the way Ponds is expressing interest. Hurt didn't even need to wait that long to show he was committed to the home state program. Coffey not doing so shows he is looking for a reason to get away, just like Tyus, Vaughn, Illikainen and Travis Reid. Which is totally fine, it's his choice. But that's why it's important to develop that east coast pipeline.
You look at the template - our 1997 Final Four team - and it sort of supports both ways of looking at this. We had two in-state players in the top 9 rotation - Jacobson and Thomas. Not sure how many stars they would have been, but Jacobson was the equivalent of four stars and Thomas would have been three stars. The rest - including the team MVP - were from out of town.
At the same time, recruiting Humphries and Pryzbilla did not put the program over the top with either winning or recruiting.
This "flowing pipeline" from the east coast has yet to get us a top 100 player... Ponds wouldn't change that trend. While it's extremely important to recruit nationally, our best change at top 50 type players is going to be the top end talent from Minnesota. Minnesota is not a destination school for premium talent on the east coast, never will be.
With that said, I was replying to you writing off the hometown pride of 16 and 17 year old kids who are thinking about their college choices. Just sounded a little ridiculous.
You look at the template - our 1997 Final Four team - and it sort of supports both ways of looking at this. We had two in-state players in the top 9 rotation - Jacobson and Thomas. Not sure how many stars they would have been, but Jacobson was the equivalent of four stars and Thomas would have been three stars. The rest - including the team MVP - were from out of town.
At the same time, recruiting Humphries and Pryzbilla did not put the program over the top with either winning or recruiting.
This is mind numbing.