One of them has an OPS of .800 even after his slump. The other has an OPS of .530 even after his "surge". I don't know how you can say that's a negligible difference. Vazquez is a better defender, but it's pretty marginal and certainly not worth the massive drop off on offense.Nowhere did I say I was in the Vasquez fan club.
My stance is that the difference between them is negligible and that playing them 50/50 is perhaps the best way to get the most productivity combined out of them. It also improves the odds they are productive in September and hopefully in October.
If it were up to me, I would probably go with more of a 55-45 split, or even just a little less than that. If Jeffers caught and then there was a subsequent Off Day, then sure go ahead and play Jeffers again. However, resting him a 2nd day is also just fine by me.
My disagreement was when you called what the Twins were doing "stupid". It's working out, for now. If there is a significant change in either Jeffers or Vasquez' production it can certainly be re-evaluated. Jeffers for more than a month now, has not been hitting at a clip that screams he deserves more playing time.
No, I can't imagine sitting Mauer 80 games. Your reference with #7 is just plain silly. He's a Hall of Famer. Jeffers no matter how much he catches will need to buy his own ticket to get into the Cooperstown Museum.
There was a much more pronounced drop off between Joe's back ups (offense & defense) and the current catchers. Also in this case, it's Vasquez that has the much higher salary, $10M compared to Jeffers $2.4M.
It is true we're talking about a difference of basically one start per week. But that's still 26-30 starts over a season and 125-150 plate appearances. That's not nothing.
Jeffers isn't a HOF'er. But he is one of the better young offensive catchers in the game and deliberately only using him 50% of the time in favor of one of the three worst hitters in baseball (at least until recently) just doesn't make sense to me.