Apparently they already tried to do this last year, but the legislature never took it up. I'm not sure what amount of $$ for improvements they're looking for. But if it's reasonable, I'd take advantage and lock them in. The debate over building Target Field was 10 years + and exhausting. Let's never do that again.So, are they trying to give the public some assurance that the team won't move even if it's sold, while giving potential buyers some sort of guarantee that they'll have state funding coming in that will help with Target Field maintenance and improvements? Guess that makes sense, but if I was buying the team, that does take away a lot of leverage I'd have in future negotiations.