gophersfan
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 5,132
- Reaction score
- 689
- Points
- 113
You'd think.Shoemaker has to be released now, right?
Unfortunately for the Twins,
TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!each MLB team employs scouts and analysts that have determined his value is practically nil.
Take it for what it's worth, but Reusse was on a Strib Podcast and predicted the Twins will have a fire sale in July. Haven't listened to it yet, but supposedly Reusse said he expects 5 or 6 players to be dealt.
Twins are down 9-0 in the first inning.
Win Twins!!
I knew a little bit about Sam Rice, but looking him up on wiki, feels like his life and career were ripped off from a Hollywood screenplay.I thought this was cool
Very Cool.I thought this was cool
That's got to make some Joe Mauer haters upset.I thought this was cool
Look at his yearly WAR post MVP.That's got to make some Joe Mauer haters upset.
OK. He had 8 years where his WAR was 3.9 or higher. Of those 8 highest years, obviously one was the MVP year, 3 came before the MVP season, and 4 (FOUR) came after the MVP season. He is third all-time on the Twins, ahead of Kirby Puckett.Look at his yearly WAR post MVP.
Dumb. He played 9 years after and 5 years before. Before MVP his WAR was below 3.9 only for his first 2 years. After he had a few good years, but became worthless once he was at 1B.OK. He had 8 years where his WAR was 3.9 or higher. Of those 8 highest years, obviously one was the MVP year, 3 came before the MVP season, and 4 (FOUR) came after the MVP season. He is third all-time on the Twins, ahead of Kirby Puckett.
Maybe he was better than a lot of our "fans" remember.
"Worthless"Dumb. He played 9 years after and 5 years before. Before MVP his WAR was below 3.9 only for his first 2 years. After he had a few good years, but became worthless once he was at 1B.
He had a WAR of 27.2 from 2004-2009 and 27.8 from 2010 on. Obviously it dropped when he went to 1B which is unavoidable. They would have like to have him catch 2-3 more years. So did he. Concussions happen.Dumb. He played 9 years after and 5 years before. Before MVP his WAR was below 3.9 only for his first 2 years. After he had a few good years, but became worthless once he was at 1B.
Third best ERA on the team, second best WHIPIf we want to talk about worthless, let’s look at Astudillo
Dumb. He played 9 years after and 5 years before. Before MVP his WAR was below 3.9 only for his first 2 years. After he had a few good years, but became worthless once he was at 1B.
TouchéThird best ERA on the team, second best WHIP
Third best ERA on the team, second best WHIP
When he's hitting, he's a valuable bench player to plug in. But he's not hitting. I don't understand their reluctance to just have him be the #2 catcher. He's really not that bad defensively and Rortvedt brings nothing.If we want to talk about worthless, let’s look at Astudillo
MLB is shifting away from that. But Mauer had all the leverage when it was time for that extension. If he'd had 2 more years at catcher like he had in 2012-2013, it wouldn't have been a bad a contract. As it was, yes, he was overpaid, but not by as much as some make it seem.Some of the real number-crunchers would tell you that, relative to his production, Mauer was underpaid for the first phase of his career. So, if he was overpaid in the later years, it basically evens out and he was generally paid what he "deserved" based on the numbers.
I found an article about this a while back, but can't remember where - maybe Baseball Prospectus.
But their point was that most players who get big-money contracts are basically being paid for past performance, not future performance.
Rortvedt is better defensively and is young. At this point I’d rather let the young guys play as much as possible.When he's hitting, he's a valuable bench player to plug in. But he's not hitting. I don't understand their reluctance to just have him be the #2 catcher. He's really not that bad defensively and Rortvedt brings nothing.
He's never going to be a big league regular IMO. Garver and Jeffers should get 100% of the innings once both are back. But until then, it's kind of a waste to have both Rortvedt and Astudillo on the bench.Rortvedt is better defensively and is young. At this point I’d rather let the young guys play as much as possible.
Who else are they going to call up though? Maybe under normal circumstances that would make sense. They’re down to 3 players on the 40 man that aren’t already on the active roster or aren’t hurt.He's never going to be a big league regular IMO. Garver and Jeffers should get 100% of the innings once both are back. But until then, it's kind of a waste to have both Rortvedt and Astudillo on the bench.