Commence the Joey King/Buggs/Josh Martin for SF arguments!!!!!!
It's not a SF debate, its a basketball and numbers debate. With the current roster they will play with another so-called 4 & center over the course of a game.
Commence the Joey King/Buggs/Josh Martin for SF arguments!!!!!!
Carlos Morris and Daquein Mcneil say hi.
It's not a SF debate, its a basketball and numbers debate. With the current roster they will play with another so-called 4 & center over the course of a game.
It's not a SF debate, its a basketball and numbers debate. With the current roster they will play with another so-called 4 & center over the course of a game.
And I don't understand your point. If Buggs played on the court at the same time as another 4 absolutely one of them would assume the role of sf or 3 for sake of running the offense.
Thanks Mods for cleaning this up.
Definitely. Hopefully they sent out messages to posters using multiple user names to attack others.
Now lets get back to 2014 recruits!
I don't see any reason Buggs or Martin can't fill in at the 3 every now and then, they can shoot the three, stretch defenses a bit with their size, what they don't do real well is handle the ball, they had better be very prepared to face a press with that type of offensive personnel in the game, defensively the stretch 2-3 zone is made for that type of a lineup, can't see them playing a man though.
What more is there to talk about on the subject?
The (6) recruits and the possibility of adding one more.
No more schollies
I know it's nearing the bottom of the ninth and we do not officially have a tender available, but I would be surprised if we don't still sign a wing. A sprained ankle, bout of the flu, or even early foul trouble would cause us to scramble. An experienced wing could get us off the bubble, and even a Mav or Chip signing should allow us to keep the rotation intact.
Howie
How would you play out the minutes today with the 5 guy rotation with thinking that our 5 Guards exclusively play the 1,2 and 3 positions?
You've got 120 minutes to dole out for
Math - 30
Hollins - 30
McNeil - 25
Mason - 15
Morris - 20
I'm not too afraid of that type of minutes from these guys. However, as you said, sprain/flu/fouls make that equation ugly really fast. A martin/Joey/Buggs for 5 to 10 minutes might help lessen the blow.
Also if Morris turns into more of a 30 minute guy (I know you hate him, not pushing buttons) it would make it easier as well.
I think your minutes look good. To nitpick, I would say 5 minutes less for McNeil and Mason. Mason could be the wildcard?
I know it's nearing the bottom of the ninth and we do not officially have a tender available, but I would be surprised if we don't still sign a wing. A sprained ankle, bout of the flu, or even early foul trouble would cause us to scramble. An experienced wing could get us off the bubble, and even a Mav or Chip signing should allow us to keep the rotation intact.
I know it's nearing the bottom of the ninth and we do not officially have a tender available.
McNeil 9.7 (much more at the end of the year after he had improved).
We are losing: Mav 9.6 min, Ellenson 6.9 min, Smith 19.0 min, Oto 18.4 min and Austin 33.1 min. Lots of these minutes were junk minutes. By the end of the year, it was really Oto and Austin contributing important minutes…so really to improve as a team…we just have to replace those minutes.
Deandre averaged 30.1 playing more in close games, Andre averaged 30.5 also playing more in close games. Buggs averaged 6.7 and McNeil 9.7 (much more at the end of the year after he had improved).
We have 5 guys coming in that can play (and Lofton sitting out). While PF was our problem area last year, with two PF's coming in and only Oto moving on, that problem has been solved. C was a question at the beginning of last year but EE and Mo made that an area of strength and we have Konate who will provide insurance policy minutes that will prevent EE and Mo having to play as much when they are injured a bit (an perhaps turn a minor injury into a bigger one).
That leaves the guards….Morris will eat up most of Austin's minutes, McNeil will increase his average significantly as he provided some valuable minutes by the end of the year. Mason will probably average at a minimum 10….Our weakest spot may very well be the SF this year…but no matter what we are not wasting nearly as many scholarships as we did last year so it is impossible to not see us as a stronger team next year. And after a year of watching Pitino coach, I think we will all once again be very pleasantly surprised at how well these new recruits are playing by the end of the year. It is going to be a blast to watch!
Agreed! Further to your point- after adjusting for games not played- Oto averaged 15 minutes, Wally 1.6 minutes and Mav 7 minutes.
Good point regarding Mav and Blocked-Three-Pointer-From-Behind-Into-the-Top-of-His-Head Guy. But Oto was injured.
Can anyone share how ESPN graded our recruiting hall in the B1G? It was for those with an Insider account.
I think it happened one time his freshmen year!I'm pretty sure I've seen you mention this like three or four different times. I don't even remember this happening, did it happen a lot when he was in? Just by how few minutes he played I can't imagine it happened all that much. The only on-court Wally moment that sticks in my mind was a reverse dunk he did that was pretty cool.
We are losing: Mav 9.6 min, Ellenson 6.9 min, Smith 19.0 min, Oto 18.4 min and Austin 33.1 min. Lots of these minutes were junk minutes. By the end of the year, it was really Oto and Austin contributing important minutes…so really to improve as a team…we just have to replace those minutes.
Deandre averaged 30.1 playing more in close games, Andre averaged 30.5 also playing more in close games. Buggs averaged 6.7 and McNeil 9.7 (much more at the end of the year after he had improved).
We have 5 guys coming in that can play (and Lofton sitting out). While PF was our problem area last year, with two PF's coming in and only Oto moving on, that problem has been solved. C was a question at the beginning of last year but EE and Mo made that an area of strength and we have Konate who will provide insurance policy minutes that will prevent EE and Mo having to play as much when they are injured a bit (an perhaps turn a minor injury into a bigger one).
That leaves the guards….Morris will eat up most of Austin's minutes, McNeil will increase his average significantly as he provided some valuable minutes by the end of the year. Mason will probably average at a minimum 10….Our weakest spot may very well be the SF this year…but no matter what we are not wasting nearly as many scholarships as we did last year so it is impossible to not see us as a stronger team next year. And after a year of watching Pitino coach, I think we will all once again be very pleasantly surprised at how well these new recruits are playing by the end of the year. It is going to be a blast to watch!
I'm nitpicking, but I'm saying it because I think its a common error. The bolded part is an incorrect statement. The last 15 games of the season McNeil averaged almost exactly 10 minutes per game. If you did just the last 8 when we were in B1G 10 championship and NIT games, he was even less (8 mpg).
So the idea that McNeil earned more minutes as the season progressed is an incorrect statement. He did play well, don't get me wrong I like the kid and think he has potential, but his increase in playing time came alot from the distribution of Andre Hollins minutes when he got hurt in the Wisconsin game. McNeil played 10+ minutes 8 out of the next 10 games when Hollins went down. He did not play his way into increased minutes as the season progressed.
Edit : Much of what I typed was correct, however, one error that I have to admit is that Andre only missed 3 games, he went right back to playing 30+ mpg against Purdue 3 games after Wisconsin. So McNeil did see a brief period of playing more minutes while Andre was healthy. Still relevant to note that once the team got into more competitive and do or die ball, he went back to 10 minutes or less.