He's not. You don't know the game very well me boyHe's absolutely better than Brosmer.
No I don't. It isn't a winner/loser thing. AK was bad last year and instead of competing here he went somewhere else. Good for him I guess that he landed in a situation where they didn't need much out of their QB and a mediocre QB has been good enough so far for them.Kinda warranted though, don't you think? Already looking like AK won the breakup.
It is a winner/loser thing. Fortunately we play them this year.No I don't. It isn't a winner/loser thing. AK was bad last year and instead of competing here he went somewhere else. Good for him I guess that he landed in a situation where they didn't need much out of their QB and a mediocre QB has been good enough so far for them.
Had he stayed here we wouldn't be in a better position than we are right now at the QB position, in fact we probably would be worse off.
Should be an interesting game.It is a winner/loser thing. Fortunately we play them this year.
Still think so? AK 58% vs Washington, Brosmer 68% vs Michigan. Season stats similar.He's absolutely better than Brosmer.
LolHe's absolutely better than Brosmer.
Before the game people were only looking at the record. I have actually seen quite a bit of Rutgers and they were not winning because of AK they were winning in spite of him. He is a little better this year but he is still not good.I don't know what people were seeing before this game. He looked basically the same as when he was here. More than capable of throwing a great pass. But super inconsistent, not a great decision maker, and inability to hit short completions to open receivers consistently. Plus his mechanics are still messed up.