That was a rough patch for sure. Mike Hohensee was a bright spot and we had some good players but that got pretty ugly fast after he left.And yet a number of posters will be saying that we settle for mediocrity!
I had season tickets all through school 1978-1983 (six years). That period looked more like mediocrity than this does!
Ski-u-mah
Platitudes for folks with nothing to say.And yet a number of posters will be saying that we settle for mediocrity!
Why in the world would you say that?Fleck has done well with the players willing to play in Minneapolis. I think he's done as well as can be done here.
I mean our 2019 season was pretty well in line with many of Iowa and Wisconsin's best years, and a 9 win season is average to good for those guys too. We have won more games than Wisconsin over the last 5 years and won 4 fewer games than Iowa in the last 5 years, with 3 of that 4 win difference being in 2020.Why in the world would you say that?
This right here is my problem with some folks on this board. My dad feels the same way. He thinks what Fleck has done is the ceiling and he's actually surprised by what he's done.
Why do people here (I actually live in Ca. now BUT I'm still a Minnesotan at heart!) feel this way? Why do we not 'feel' we can do better? Why can we not be better than Wisconsin and Iowa, or at least match what they do?
Unprecedented, by a lot, in the last half century of Gopher football. Take out the covid year and it's even more impressive.
So we're at our ceiling?I mean our 2019 season was pretty well in line with many of Iowa and Wisconsin's best years, and a 9 win season is average to good for those guys too. We have won more games than Wisconsin over the last 5 years and won 4 fewer games than Iowa in the last 5 years, with 3 of that 4 win difference being in 2020.
We aren't miles behind these programs like people want to believe. If PJ is here for many more years we are going to have a lot of good years, and some down years sprinkled in. I don't know how anyone can look at PJ's tenure here and say that it has not been very successful relative to reasonable expectations.
The floor has been raised substantially; the ceiling is this -So we're at our ceiling?
The issue isn't matching what Iowa and Wisconsin can do. I think most feel that is very attainable and something to shoot for. Heck in a lot of ways we have already started doing that we just have to sustain the success the way they have.Why in the world would you say that?
This right here is my problem with some folks on this board. My dad feels the same way. He thinks what Fleck has done is the ceiling and he's actually surprised by what he's done.
Why do people here (I actually live in Ca. now BUT I'm still a Minnesotan at heart!) feel this way? Why do we not 'feel' we can do better? Why can we not be better than Wisconsin and Iowa, or at least match what they do?
Add in that any coach that has a magical year is usually coaching at a new school soon thereafter.The issue isn't matching what Iowa and Wisconsin can do. I think most feel that is very attainable and something to shoot for. Heck in a lot of ways we have already started doing that we just have to sustain the success the way they have.
The reality is that at a place like Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa....if you can win 8-9-10 games, be in the mix for your division/conference and get a good bowl game you are pretty much at the realistic ceiling for those programs. You might have the outlier year where you exceed that and will also at times have the stinkers where you fall short.
Those that see striving for that as accepting mediocrity are looking at things through the lens of success meaning you are on par with the programs like Ohio State, Alabama, Georgia....The reality is that it will be very difficult, if not impossible for programs like Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota to get to those levels on any sort of regular basis outside of the magical year here and there. We will always be fighting an uphill battle against those helmet school programs in recruiting hotbeds with tons of high level talent right in their backyard.
A few other stats:
Because the Badgers and Hawkeyes play in college towns that seem to appeal more to 5Stars than does a pro town. Because we've seen six decades of mediocre performance with two brief periods of above average performance (Mason and Fleck) Because Minnesota is the State of Hockey not football. Because Minneapolis is farther from talent-rich areas than any other Big Ten school.Why in the world would you say that?
This right here is my problem with some folks on this board. My dad feels the same way. He thinks what Fleck has done is the ceiling and he's actually surprised by what he's done.
Why do people here (I actually live in Ca. now BUT I'm still a Minnesotan at heart!) feel this way? Why do we not 'feel' we can do better? Why can we not be better than Wisconsin and Iowa, or at least match what they do?
The Badgers and Hawkeyes are recruiting at the same level on paper that we are under Fleck. None of our programs are landing 5* guys outside of very rare occasions. Our recruiting classes on paper are right in line with everyone in the Big Ten outside of the Ohio State, Michigan, and Penn State crowd.Because the Badgers and Hawkeyes play in college towns that seem to appeal more to 5Stars than does a pro town. Because we've seen six decades of mediocre performance with two brief periods of above average performance (Mason and Fleck) Because Minnesota is the State of Hockey not football. Because Minneapolis is farther from talent-rich areas than any other Big Ten school.
Nevertheless, I've enjoyed following the Gophers since the 50s but never more than these last few years because nearly every week, I can hope for a win. This was only true once before (Mason) after about the mid 60s.
The NFL Draft in April will be his 6th since he took over in 2017. Fleck will have a minimum of two more players drafted in April. Fleck is a victim of his own success. Gopher fans crave a West division crown, would love to see it in the next 2-3 years.
Yawn. Go back to buckyvilleAt the risk of being redundant, it is the conference record that really counts.
Using that index PJ is behind his peers, in the so-to-be-forgotten West.
The majority seem to be content with that.