prespsguy
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2022
- Messages
- 104
- Reaction score
- 54
- Points
- 28
This is exactly it. Kids from economically disadvantaged families often do not participate in youth sports or off-season training programs. Two factors are involved; cost and transportation. It's no coincidence that in the Twin Cities metro, the schools that are most successful in almost all sports are the ones with the highest enrollments and lowest rates of poverty.I really don't think people understand the advantages that they have. Couple examples.
Ability to get off work and get kids to practice
Ability to have quality parents that are willing to run around and carpool kids
Ability to pay
At our school we have about 55 8th graders playing football this year. There will be close to 80 kids on the 9th grade team next year. Kids will come for the magnet program with busing, kids will play that haven't played before or focused on other sports, practices are all after school and kids can get there. There is no weekend commitment. Until a kids can drive and has a car it's really hard to get around. Some kids live a few communities over and can't get rides to activities that don't line up after school.
Every year there are starters on out 9th grade football and basketball teams that no one has ever seen before.
This condition has only been exasperated in the last 20 years by the inflation of costs for youth sports as well as the culture of sports specialization and off-season expectations. In addition, kids who come from poverty are more likely to move several times during their schooling years as families are constantly looking to minimize housing costs. This transient nature excludes kids from the culture and connection to any sports programs a community may offer.
This is something the state legislature could have done a better job at addressing, but rest assured, the kids in Orono, Edina, North Oaks, and Tonka Bay are getting free school lunch.