2023-2024 College Basketball Other Games Thread

Donate To GopherHole
MUgopher32 said:
Yes it is. DePaul and Georgetown weigh them down as a whole.

But they have 81% of their league as Q1 road games. Thats why the big 10 is what is. In the big east you cant get a bad loss(assuming you dont blow the Gtown or Depaul game which no one has).

There is not one person involved in basketball, bracketology or even coaches that will say the big 10 is stronger.

Is Clingan a starter yet? You keep avoiding
Click to expand...
The B1G has more teams in the field as well. You have 0 stats to support the claim they are better.

He plays 20 minutes a game and splits time.
 


MUgopher32 said:
Hes a starter and has one of the best on/off court advanced metrics in the country. And you said Dawson would start at fu cking center for Uconn.
Click to expand...
He plays 20 minutes a game and splits time with a forward who averages 5 points a game.
 

Johnnyboy18 said:
He plays 20 minutes a game and splits time with a forward who averages 5 points a game.
Click to expand...
None of that has anything to do with what I just said.

And referencing ppg kinda proves how little you know about basketball.

Clingan didnt even average 7 ppg last year. He was a massive piece on the best team in the country.
 

MUgopher32 said:
None of that has anything to do with what I just said.

And referencing ppg kinda proves how little you know about basketball.

Clingan didnt even average 7 ppg last year. He was a massive piece on the best team in the country.
Click to expand...
Awesome good for him. He still splits time with a forward who averages 5 points a game.

So what metric is the Big East better than the B1G besides your feelings? It's not teams in the tournament, average conference rankings or anything else.
 


MUgopher32 said:
No the Big East teams are far ahead hence why they have 80% of their league in the top 70 of college basketball

They won games out of league.

Again, you continue to show you dont know how this works.
Click to expand...

And you continue to show how you don't understand that a losing record against a conference that you deem as weak doesn't favor your case at all.

Johnnyboy18 said:
Weird how they're 5th in NET and the B1G is 2nd. Big East isn't a better conference by any metric.
Click to expand...

I think I get where the mixup is. MUgopher thinks that higher numbers are better. For both the NET rankings and head to head losses.
 

stocker08 said:
And you continue to show how you don't understand that a losing record against a conference that you deem as weak doesn't favor your case at all.



I think I get where the mixup is. MUgopher thinks that higher numbers are better. For both the NET rankings and head to head losses.
Click to expand...

uhh no, I have established that the BE has more teams with lower nets, hence why they have more top 50 wins and Q1 opportunities. Are you actually this stupid?

I deem Chicago State as weak. They beat Northwestern head to head. There you go.
 

Johnnyboy18 said:
Awesome good for him. He still splits time with a forward who averages 5 points a game.

So what metric is the Big East better than the B1G besides your feelings? It's not teams in the tournament, average conference rankings or anything else.
Click to expand...

Huh? The big east is going to end with a far better % of teams in the tournament haha.

Why do you keep referencing ppg. Are you unaware that basketball has more than scoring?
 

stocker08 said:
And you continue to show how you don't understand that a losing record against a conference that you deem as weak doesn't favor your case at all.



I think I get where the mixup is. MUgopher thinks that higher numbers are better. For both the NET rankings and head to head losses.
Click to expand...
You also can't include the bottom 2 teams in the conference because reasons.
 




MUgopher32 said:
Huh? The big east is going to end with a far better % of teams in the tournament haha.

Why do you keep referencing ppg. Are you unaware that basketball has more than scoring?
Click to expand...
They have 5 teams in the tournament currently by pretty much every bracketology I've seen and have 2 of the worst P5 teams in the country.
 

Johnnyboy18 said:
They have 5 teams in the tournament currently by pretty much every bracketology I've seen and have 2 of the worst P5 teams in the country.
Click to expand...

They have 6/11 in on bracket matrix and 9/11 are on the bubble higher than the Gophers. You two morons keep finding a way to shit on the hometown team by bringing up a league that wasnt referenced other wise.

Its impressive.
 

MUgopher32 said:
They have 6/11 in on bracket matrix and 9/11 are on the bubble higher than the Gophers. You two morons keep finding a way to shit on the hometown team by bringing up a league that wasnt referenced other wise.

Its impressive.
Click to expand...
Yes because the league is worse than B1G pretty simple. What's their average net ranking?
 




Johnnyboy18 said:
Yes because the league is worse than B1G pretty simple. What's their average net ranking?
Click to expand...

No the league is stronger.

Why are the the .500 conference record Big10 teams below the .500ish record BE teams on bracketology S curves

Spoiler alert, their strength.
 

MUgopher32 said:
Yes it is. DePaul and Georgetown weigh them down as a whole.

But they have 81% of their league as Q1 road games. Thats why the big 10 is what is. In the big east you cant get a bad loss(assuming you dont blow the Gtown or Depaul game which no one has).

There is not one person involved in basketball, bracketology or even coaches that will say the big 10 is stronger.

Is Clingan a starter yet? You keep avoiding
Click to expand...

Real life bozo
 


MUgopher32 said:
Try % of league in the top 75, you know Q1 road games?

You are so stupid you dont realize that in this 4/14 and 3/11 are like identical %.
Click to expand...
Don't you mean 3/9 since Depaul and Georgetown don't count?
 

Johnnyboy18 said:
Don't you mean 3/9 since Depaul and Georgetown don't count?
Click to expand...

I guess if you want to not count them sure.

Not sure if its the aspergers or what, but ive used 11 every single time. You know, the amount of teams in the league.
 

MUgopher32 said:
uhh no, I have established that the BE has more teams with lower nets, hence why they have more top 50 wins and Q1 opportunities. Are you actually this stupid?

I deem Chicago State as weak. They beat Northwestern head to head. There you go.
Click to expand...

And a lower number of wins than losses against the Big Ten. Our weakest by far is undefeated against the Big East. Weak conference beating up on an even weaker one I suppose.
 

MUgopher32 said:
I guess if you want to not count them sure.

Not sure if its the aspergers or what, but ive used 11 every single time. You know, the amount of teams in the league.
Click to expand...
"There is not one person involved in basketball, bracketology or even coaches that will say the big 10 is stronger."

Every metric and human power ranking besides the resident Marquette fan lmao
 

stocker08 said:
And a lower number of wins than losses against the Big Ten. Our weakest by far is undefeated against the Big East. Weak conference beating up on an even weaker one I suppose.
Click to expand...

Yeah the big 12 actually sucks

Marquette would never lose a game in the big 12. Shaka has owned the big 12. You know, head to head.

And then you already confirmed the big 10 sucks because Northwestern head to head couldnt beat Chicago State.

Head to head Uconn has beaten all of college basketball over the last two years. So Big East is the best.

Because you know, head to head. Shit, Shaka might have to petition to the NCAA for a ring, you know....head to head on Uconn last year.
 

Johnnyboy18 said:
"There is not one person involved in basketball, bracketology or even coaches that will say the big 10 is stronger."

Every metric and human power ranking besides the resident Marquette fan lmao
Click to expand...

You still havent answered the question.

Why are the .500 conference record BE teams higher on the S curve than the .500 Big 10 teams.

Follow up question.

Why do the GOphers have 6 Big 10 wins but only 1 Q1 win of those? Why isnt that an issue in the BE

This is rhetorical btw, strength of the league.

16/20 BE games that any of the top 9 teams play will be in the good win/good loss category.
 

MUgopher32 said:
You still havent answered the question.

Why are the .500 conference record BE teams higher on the S curve than the .500 Big 10 teams.

Follow up question.

Why do the GOphers have 6 Big 10 wins but only 1 Q1 win of those? Why isnt that an issue in the BE

This is rhetorical btw, strength of the league.

16/20 BE games that any of the top 9 teams play will be in the good win/good loss category.
Click to expand...
That's the flaw with your metrics. They have teams like Villanova ranked in the top 40 for playing in a conference. They lost to all of Pennsylvania schools for the 1st time in history. No one with a straight face can argue Villanova is a top 40 team in the country.
 

Johnnyboy18 said:
That's the flaw with your metrics. They have teams like Villanova ranked in the top 40 for playing in a conference. They lost to all of Pennsylvania schools for the 1st time in history. No one with a straight face can argue Villanova is a top 40 team in the country.
Click to expand...

Villanova is top 40 because they beat UNC/Texas Tech and Memphis you dolt.

I do agree that Nova is not very good this year. But if we are using Stockers idiotic head to head logic they beat Maryland by about 1 million pts. So i guess theyd run the table in the Big10
 

MUgopher32 said:
Yeah the big 12 actually sucks

Marquette would never lose a game in the big 12. Shaka has owned the big 12. You know, head to head.

And then you already confirmed the big 10 sucks because Northwestern head to head couldnt beat Chicago State.

Head to head Uconn has beaten all of college basketball over the last two years. So Big East is the best.

Because you know, head to head. Shit, Shaka might have to petition to the NCAA for a ring, you know....head to head on Uconn last year.
Click to expand...

Lol.....bragging about a losing record to the Big Ten. Bragging about a lower NET rankings. And now a Marquette fan bragging about another teams National Championship.

Don't be upset. The Big East is just an average to below average conference this year.
 

Johnnyboy18 said:
That's the flaw with your metrics. They have teams like Villanova ranked in the top 40 for playing in a conference. They lost to all of Pennsylvania schools for the 1st time in history. No one with a straight face can argue Villanova is a top 40 team in the country.
Click to expand...

Also this isnt "my metrics"

The committee literally selects teams using NET, Quad wins and Quad losses. So those things all quite literally are the most important things. With SOS mixed in.
 

MUgopher32 said:
Villanova is top 40 because they beat UNC/Texas Tech and Memphis you dolt.

I do agree that Nova is not very good this year. But if we are using Stockers idiotic head to head logic they beat Maryland by about 1 million pts. So i guess theyd run the table in the Big10
Click to expand...

Maryland is in the bottom half of the Big Ten. Along with Iowa and Rutgers.....who beat up on the Big East's #3 team.
 

stocker08 said:
Lol.....bragging about a losing record to the Big Ten. Bragging about a lower NET rankings. And now a Marquette fan bragging about another teams National Championship.

Don't be upset. The Big East is just an average to below average conference this year.
Click to expand...

I didnt brag about anything. I used your logic of head to head

Congrats on saying the Gophs wouldnt win a game in the SEC though. I personally dont agree.

But you know, head to head. Your words, not mine.
 


You must log in or register to reply here.



Top Bottom