Search results

there's some real smoke aka tony wrote an article on it and given the two teams are full of inbreeding, someone said yeah there could be interest. if they won't give him a pay raise in today's CFB, they're not going to keep many/any coordinators around

agreed. pick the field based on merit and lock the top 12 (to be honest, we don't need to see who seeds 13 and higher are as it is completely irrelvant), which you are ranking purely based on resume (however you so choose) to that point. If you're a higher seed, know you could get bounced by one...

i mean it's interesting. we've decided that that win over GA is a really big deal. the same GA who needed a gift wrapping from the refs to beat tech, beat Kentucky 13-12 and Miss State 41-31 (who lost by 24 to Toledo), and for all intents and purposes is far worse than they were last year...

i guess when you're worth tens of billions and in your 80s, theres only so many things to spend your money on, you don't really give a shit what it costs to win because it doesn't really matter anymore.

Can’t say I was expecting it be 12 when I read through the board. People are aware msu beat unc and hung with Kansas right?

In on. Thanks for catching my typo. My point is that if you felt they were in your top 12 prior to this, you’ve deemed their quality thus far is one of the 12 best teams (you don’t get to “assume” they’ll win and include them). Punishing a team for losing an extra game another didn’t have to...

I disagree and that’s the joy of the board. Fleck plays who he trusts and he definitely has trusted Nubin. He’s not going to roll into next year with only freshman/rising Sophs on the roster and would’ve asked Nubin to stay if so. To me it’s that he feels good about what’s coming back and that...

Would take this as it means it’s near a lock DT is back

think more alluding to the high number that transfer after freshman year and don't stick around to develop if they aren't playing

to me, probably Kekehuna on offense who they did an awful job of getting involved consistently. then probably wohler on defense i guess?

Did you decide they were on merit or based on winning their conference? For example, your MAC team that goes 12-0 is in because they “won the conference”. They lose the title they haven’t done that. A 12-0 P4 team who beats the number 2, 3, and 4 but loses to some other team by 55 shouldn’t get...

what a bizarre set of listed schools that play wildly different styles. IA and MI who ground and pound. Louisville who throws constantly. Auburn who runs the QB a lot. Seems like we just wrote some shit and called it good because those teams have graduating QBs or sucked at QB. Can't see any way...

I agree on this as well. Shouldn't be punished and I also don't really think they should release any rankings other than the final ones. It biases you when you have a prior set of rankings and further you shouldn't make the rankings based on "well they will go up when they win next week so it's...

Personally I don’t hate computer rankings and think college hockey has the best selection criteria purely because it’s objective, everyone knows the criteria before the season, and you have the autobids in place. Instead you’ve got a bunch of random people in a room who watching varying amounts...

Yep this argument that they’d win because you think they’d win is actually patently false based on the teams they lost to and who they rank around unless you just want to ignore all data and say their helmet has a script A on it so it must be true

If I’m bama and Georgia, might as well just not play anyone and sit out all year and they’ll put you in because we think they’re better than everyone because the helmet and jersey say so. There’s literally no combination of metrics that puts bama in ahead of their cohort other than the emblem on...

Why yes that is certainly how we should decide. Based on what Vegas thinks the betting public will put half the money on

Miami is out. Only way bama is out is if they give Clemson the bump but keep 2 loss (2 better losses) ahead of bama in smu. They put Ole Miss and s car there as well to make bama look better so they can see look at how highly ranked the teams they beat are while fully buying into that fans are...

Oh you mean a committee with no spine or semblance of objectivity managed to fuck it up yet again? Shocked!

3 guys for us. USC, Wash, Neb, MSU, WI, NW all with none.