Spaulding!No!
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2019
- Messages
- 14,285
- Reaction score
- 8,968
- Points
- 113
Watching Mr. Darnold play rt now. Yeah, MN might have made it to the Super Bowl with Darnold. Penny wise - pound foolish by the wilfs.
The fact that we had the Bears game won was huger. It's on us
Watching Mr. Darnold play rt now. Yeah, MN might have made it to the Super Bowl with Darnold. Penny wise - pound foolish by the wilfs.
The Jags could be #1 in the AFC and also didn't have a single Pro Bowler.
That proves the topic is completely irrelevant to things that matter.
Purple haze continuesCheap Wilfs.
Obviously this was tongue in cheek, but for posterity the Wilfs don't have any input on any personnel decisions.Watching Mr. Darnold play rt now. Yeah, MN might have made it to the Super Bowl with Darnold. Penny wise - pound foolish by the wilfs.
Is that so? How much you laying?
The only thing I get from this post is that you agree the still potentially #1 seed in the AFC doesn't have a single Pro Bowler in any real position.Good one.
The Jaguars do have a single Pro Bowler who has helped them to their now 12-4 record.
Any Jaguars fans tuning into the Pro Bowl Games will have a rooting interest unlike Vikings fans currently.
The above bolded actually incorrect per a post (see link below) I made on 12/3 following the Seahawk game; the information I cited was from Alex Lewis’ the Vikings beat reporter for The Athletic. Below the first link, is a link to the article on 12/1.Obviously this was tongue in cheek, but for posterity the Wilfs don't have any input on any personnel decisions.
KAM and KOC were given free rein to cut Darnold and claim that McCarthy was ready. An incredible blunder
YesIs that so?
I don’t bet cash, but would be more than happy to make a ban bet with you once the line is set.How much you laying?
Maybe there’s a Joey or Randall awaiting vs. a Rudd or Clemons - I think the key is Just Say No to anyone named DuaneCould drop all the way to 20 in the draft.
LOL
Refs tanking?
I'm sure it would be offsetting but they should still call it.Refs tanking?
The only thing I get from this post is that you agree the still potentially #1 seed in the AFC doesn't have a single Pro Bowler in any real position.
As you know, long snappers are all entirely interchangeable, with almost zero variance between them, and are the least valuable players in football.
Ross Matiscik isn't any better than any other long snapper in the league. Honestly have no idea how they select them. It could just be a random bone thrown to a random team.
My goodness, you say so many ridiculous things on this thread, but I can’t let this one pass. For a number of years now, neuroscientists have established that the human brain is not fully developed until age 25. You speak with such assurance about something you are totally off the mark on. Yes, reps matter, but 25 is not interchangeable with 22 (not in football and not in life).There is no physical or mental (talking biology of the brain) maturing left to do at 22. It doesn't matter if you're 22 or 25, in of itself.
What matters is the NFL reps you've gotten.
You moved the Goal Posts.
My goodness, you say so many ridiculous things on this thread, but I can’t let this one pass.