gophmeister
Active member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2009
- Messages
- 3,204
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 38
I just listened to Bob Sansevere's audio blog on PPress website. Sansevere asked the panel about the head coaching potential of the vikings' coordinators. It turned into a dicussion of would any of them consider coaching the gophers. They said the D coordinator wouldn't want to coach college, but that Bevell may consider coaching in the college ranks, but they weren't sure. The quote I found most stunning was, "the smartest thing for Maturi to do is to fire Brewster and move on." Is it really that bad? Remember, these were the vikings' beat writers talking. I would suggest that they were pretty objective about the situation. I haven't heard anyone (Sid doesn't count) in the media speak one word of support for Brewster. Even during the darkest days of the Wacker era there were still some who said he deserved more time. Three years into his tenure, people were not calling for him to be fired en masse so to speak.
I really don't subscribe to the notion that the media is against the gophers, but I do think they take some unfair jabs at times. But that's life. However, it seems Brewster has not impressed the media or a good percentage of the fans. It's easy to say it's the coach's fault, but Brew really hasn't won convincingly, so I can understand why people are talking. In all honesty, we could have easily been 1-10 or 2-9. Syracuse and Air Force took us to the final minutes and Nothwestern and Michigan State were close games too until the end. We played absolutely terrible versus Illinois before storming back. I tried to find a silver lining in the close win over SDSU, but there really was none. They won too ugly for it to be considered anything but a loss.
Here are my questions.
Why does it seem that Brewster doesn't have his act together coachingwise to so many observers?
Hypothetically speaking would Bevell come in with a lot of credibility with the locals? Does that benefit the program? Does the gopher nation like the idea of a badger as a head coach?
Does anyone get the feeling the bowl could be Brew's last as head coach? How ugly would he have to lose?
If he wins the bowl against a perceived superior opponent does he get his contract extend or is his reward keeping his job?
If he goes, any bright suggestions about who to hire?
I really don't subscribe to the notion that the media is against the gophers, but I do think they take some unfair jabs at times. But that's life. However, it seems Brewster has not impressed the media or a good percentage of the fans. It's easy to say it's the coach's fault, but Brew really hasn't won convincingly, so I can understand why people are talking. In all honesty, we could have easily been 1-10 or 2-9. Syracuse and Air Force took us to the final minutes and Nothwestern and Michigan State were close games too until the end. We played absolutely terrible versus Illinois before storming back. I tried to find a silver lining in the close win over SDSU, but there really was none. They won too ugly for it to be considered anything but a loss.
Here are my questions.
Why does it seem that Brewster doesn't have his act together coachingwise to so many observers?
Hypothetically speaking would Bevell come in with a lot of credibility with the locals? Does that benefit the program? Does the gopher nation like the idea of a badger as a head coach?
Does anyone get the feeling the bowl could be Brew's last as head coach? How ugly would he have to lose?
If he wins the bowl against a perceived superior opponent does he get his contract extend or is his reward keeping his job?
If he goes, any bright suggestions about who to hire?