SDGopherFan
Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 453
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
this year with talent, I counted 3 players on the the Top 250 watch list. Two more than the entire state of MN.
How many more in the rest of the State of Colorado? Look at Hopkins basketball. Think of all the DI talent they had last year. Loaded.
This would be a great year to bring some more Mullen kids in. We have not had great luck there in the past. I thought with the connection, we would do better there.
Considering Brewster's ties to Mullen I'm surprised we haven't gotten more interest from players there.
I just don't see the ties being that strong. Brewster didn't live there long and I would imagine that the Big 12 programs that have been recruiting Denver for forever have stronger ties.
I don't know where this connection keeps coming from...as I recall, Tim Brewster lived in Colorado for two years. Kyle Theret was a last second addition to our class, as well as Clint Brewster. Clint lasted one season before transferring. I'd hardly call that a pipeline. Just my thoughts.
Thanks for your thoughts. Here's one of my own: I'm constantly amazed at the way posters here manufacture arguments to counter. Uh, nobody called it a "pipeline."
what evidence is there that this "foot in the door" strategy works at all? After we signed Theret, people assumed we were "building a pipeline" to Mullen. Likewise, after the Skyline 4, it was a given that recruits were going to be burning a trail up 35 to Bierman. However, despite the fact that there have been several good-to-very good prospects coming out of both schools, we have signed 0.0 players from Mullen, and 0.0 players from Skyline,
Well, I'll actually be serious about this, even though it seems like we're debating semantics and degrees, you know shades of gray and all that. I don't know how strong Brewster's ties with Mullen ever were or are. He did send two high-profile players there and no doubt was pretty well known when he was around. How that translated into ties or burned bridges is hard for an outsider (me) to know. Regarding hyperbole, perhaps that's part of what I dislike in a lot of discussions here. Why take a serious point someone has made and use hyperbole to rebut? First, their point deserves more serious consideration. Second, you run the risk of making someone like me think you're blatantly manufacturing viewpoints to help move along your own POV. But whatever works. Thanks for clarifying.
I didn't believe you that Mullen was on another level then Cretin, so I looked up who's signed from each school the past 5 years(Rivals).
Mullen-24 players(0-5*,4-4*,8-3*,9-2*,2-0*) Cretin-12 players(2-5*,1-4*,4-3*,3-2*,2-0*)
So even though Mullen has produced 2x the amount of players, it seems that Cretin produces more quality players. I'd say they are both very successful catholic programs that are pretty equal(but that might just be my MN bias lol)
I can agree with that. If you look up "all years", Rivals has files on 29 CDH guys and 61 Mullen guys. CDH has produced top flight recruits like Floyd and Henderson (both 5 stars) and Rafael Eubanks and Matt Carufel (both 5.9 4-stars). Mullen has produced two 5.9 4 stars, along with 5 other 4 star players. Advantage quality to CDH, quantity to JK Mullen.
That said, this year they have a LOT of talent, as the OP of this thread said. I have no idea about CDH this year.