Would you take a #6 seed if it were offered right now?



The average "guy" at the bleacher report knows less about the subject they are covering than my dog, who is quite smart, and loves to chase squirrels, only knows to avoid a bouncing basketball or get momentarily squished.
 


The average "guy" at the bleacher report knows less about the subject they are covering than my dog, who is quite smart, and loves to chase squirrels, only knows to avoid a bouncing basketball or get momentarily squished.

So what you're saying is he may be no smarter than Lloyd Christmas?

I sure hope he didn't have Northwestern in his final 2012 projection like Jerry Palm did.
 


A 6 seed in the NCAA tourney?! I'd take a 6 seed in the Big 1? tourney!
 


considering he has Wisconsin as a 5. NO.

I think the Gophers will be top 3 in the Big10 with Indiana and MSU/OSU.

Im thinking 4 seed.
 

I think 6 seed is about the minimum seed we'll get next year in the tourney, that would put us between 21 and 24 nationally, and I'm hoping we finish at least 20. This March should be fun, when we can finally discuss (hopefully) what seed we'll get as opposed to whether we'll make it into the tourney at all.
 





I wouldnt take it. We have the talent barring injury or bad coaching to do better.
 






Gopher Warrior said:
A 6 seed in the NCAA tourney?! I'd take a 6 seed in the Big 1? tourney!

6th seed in Big Ten Tourney?? - You have pathetic expectations for the upcoming season.
 

He is just pathetic in general....not just his projections.
 

Man, I'd take that in a heart beat. Most of you guys are just projecting them to flip flop their B1G record from the last two years based on an NIT run.
 

Really? Not taking a 6 right now? I would in a heartbeat. A six seed in the B10 tourney is more likely than a 3, wouldn't you agree?
 

Man, I'd take that in a heart beat. Most of you guys are just projecting them to flip flop their B1G record from the last two years based on an NIT run.

I am basing my projections based on this team's talent, and the fact we are getting everyone meaningful back with more experience. The team lacked leadership after Trevor went down and it showed, but I think we had a number of people emerge and I think that will carry over to next season.

I would be disappointed with lower than a top3 B1G finish and lower than a 4 seed.
 

I am basing my projections based on this team's talent, and the fact we are getting everyone meaningful back with more experience. The team lacked leadership after Trevor went down and it showed, but I think we had a number of people emerge and I think that will carry over to next season.

I would be disappointed with lower than a top3 B1G finish and lower than a 4 seed.

Top 3 means beating out at least two of Indiana, Ohio State, Michigan State, and Michigan, and that's taking for granted that we finish ahead of Wisconsin. I think we are better than Wisconsin, but unless the top 50 recruits coming into Michigan and the McDonald's All-Americans who didn't seem much floor time last year at Ohio State prove to be overrated, then I think it's hard to say we're a better team than any of the four I previously mentioned. Most years, I think a team like ours would be able to finish 3rd or better in conference, but the Big Ten is very strong this season, and right now, I don't see us being better than Indiana, Ohio State, Michigan, or Michigan State.

I think we'll finish fifth, assuming Wisconsin doesn't yet again weasel their way up in the standings above more talented teams, and a minimum of a 6 or 7 seed, hopefully higher.
 

Hey new member here. Been a gophers fans since I was about 6 and got into sports, been a follower of the forum for awhile, finally decided to join.

Anyways I am a huge College Basketball fan (hence the username) Although my predictions were poor once the NCAA tourney started last year. I haven't looked a ton at every B1G team yet for this upcoming season. I think Wisconsin, Michigan and OSU will all be down this year (but OSU will still be pretty good, as usual). Not completely sold on Indiana yet, but they will be good. Not #1 in the nation good though. I think the Gophers could be top 3 or 4 in the B1G and make it to atleast the Sweet 16. So all in all a 6 would be a dissappointment, to me, but making it in at all would be nice.

For the record, I hate bleacher report, even though I have a friend who writes for them.
 

Top 3 means beating out at least two of Indiana, Ohio State, Michigan State, and Michigan, and that's taking for granted that we finish ahead of Wisconsin. I think we are better than Wisconsin, but unless the top 50 recruits coming into Michigan and the McDonald's All-Americans who didn't seem much floor time last year at Ohio State prove to be overrated, then I think it's hard to say we're a better team than any of the four I previously mentioned. Most years, I think a team like ours would be able to finish 3rd or better in conference, but the Big Ten is very strong this season, and right now, I don't see us being better than Indiana, Ohio State, Michigan, or Michigan State.

I think we'll finish fifth, assuming Wisconsin doesn't yet again weasel their way up in the standings above more talented teams, and a minimum of a 6 or 7 seed, hopefully higher.

I do think we will match up very well with Ohio State and could cause them problems so I think finishing ahead of them is possible. MSU is MSU and have our number, so there's always a psychological hump to get over. Michigan I think we'll play tough, our two games with them last year were decided by 9 pts total including overtime, all without Trevor. Finally Indiana is going to be brutal but we were the only team to beat them at Assembly Hall last year so anything can happen!
 

I do think we will match up very well with Ohio State and could cause them problems so I think finishing ahead of them is possible. MSU is MSU and have our number, so there's always a psychological hump to get over. Michigan I think we'll play tough, our two games with them last year were decided by 9 pts total including overtime, all without Trevor. Finally Indiana is going to be brutal but we were the only team to beat them at Assembly Hall last year so anything can happen!

Agreed with most of what you said here, I think on the floor we match up well with most of the top teams except Indiana, who I think will be just too deep and too talented for us and for a lot of teams. I've based my fifth place finish prediction mostly off of how talented I think the teams are, I certainly don't think the Gophers are incapable of beating Michigan, Michigan State, or Ohio State, though we play OSU only once, and it's in Columbus this year. We haven't beaten Michigan State since our overtime victory in the 2010 Big Ten Tournament, but the last two times we've played them at home have been us holding a lead going into the last 5 minutes or so and then blowing it. I think in 2011 Michigan State finished the game on something like a 13-1 run. We can beat them, we just REALLY need to close out. When we tried to "take the air out of the ball" toward the end of the game this past season, I think that's what killed us. We just wanted the game to end right there, we didn't just keep our foot on the gas, keep attacking.

Like I said earlier, I'm basing my prediction on talent level, I certainly think we're capable of beating pretty much anyone except Indiana. I think we are the fifth most talented team in the conference, as I just don't see much star power in Madison this season outside of Dekker. Picturing Mike Brusewitz, Jared Berggren, Ben Brust, or Ryan Evans as "stars" just feels weird, or for that matter, that 3 star redshirt freshman point guard George Marshall from Chicago that Bucky fans seem to be so high on.

A couple other things in regards to the article, this guy pegged Florida State, our upcoming ACC Challenge opponent as a 10 seed, which seemed maybe a little low. They do lose five(!) seniors, but I saw at least one Florida State fan who said that FSU's top four scorers all return, and seemed almost insulted that they were given a lowly opponent like Minnesota (I don't think he knew that we're a likely preseason top 25 team though). I thought Minnesota and Florida State seemed like a fairly even matchup, with Florida State maybe not quite as good as we should be next season, not bad by any means, but then also getting home court advantage to offset this small difference. I think it will be a good game, but with my very limited knowledge of FSU basketball, I expected them to be in more of the 5-8 seed range, maybe a 9. Will we be significantly better than them when we play next season?

Also, I noticed Alabama listed as a 13 seed, which seemed like a very low seed for a team from one of the six power conferences. Selection Sunday, if you're reading this, would you know what the lowest seed a BCS team has gotten is? According to a guy on Yahoo answers, Georgia won their conference tournament and made it in as a 13 seed, but even with the PAC-12 as bad as it was last year, even Colorado and Cal got in as 11 and 12 seeds respectively. A 13 seed seems very low for a BCS team with an at-large bid, so I was just curious, the writer of the article probably didn't put in enough thought to realize that a BCS team likely would not get a seed that low.

I also noticed he had Purdue as one of the first four out, and no mention of Iowa. I would not be surprised to see either of them make the tourney come March.
 

Hey new member here. Been a gophers fans since I was about 6 and got into sports, been a follower of the forum for awhile, finally decided to join.

Anyways I am a huge College Basketball fan (hence the username) Although my predictions were poor once the NCAA tourney started last year. I haven't looked a ton at every B1G team yet for this upcoming season. I think Wisconsin, Michigan and OSU will all be down this year (but OSU will still be pretty good, as usual). Not completely sold on Indiana yet, but they will be good. Not #1 in the nation good though. I think the Gophers could be top 3 or 4 in the B1G and make it to atleast the Sweet 16. So all in all a 6 would be a dissappointment, to me, but making it in at all would be nice.

For the record, I hate bleacher report, even though I have a friend who writes for them.

Michigan should be very, very good. Definitely won't be a down year for them unless they have injuries or something weird happens. Indiana should be really good too. Gotta keep in mind that teams bring in new players, some of which will be making big impacts from day one.
 

Selection Sunday, if you're reading this, would you know what the lowest seed a BCS team has gotten is? According to a guy on Yahoo answers, Georgia won their conference tournament and made it in as a 13 seed, but even with the PAC-12 as bad as it was last year, even Colorado and Cal got in as 11 and 12 seeds respectively. A 13 seed seems very low for a BCS team with an at-large bid, so I was just curious, the writer of the article probably didn't put in enough thought to realize that a BCS team likely would not get a seed that low.

In terms of an at-large bid, pretty certain a #12 is the lowest seed a major/BCS school has received. I know that's the case going back to at least 2000.

Georgia was a #14 in 2008 after they went on that run to the earn the SEC's auto bid, and Mississippi State was a #13 after they won the SEC tourney in 2009.
 

Wasn't Oklahoma a 13 in the 90's once? I might be off, but I seem to remember that one.
 


Michigan should be very, very good. Definitely won't be a down year for them unless they have injuries or something weird happens. Indiana should be really good too. Gotta keep in mind that teams bring in new players, some of which will be making big impacts from day one.

I Agree on Indiana. I should of specified. I think they will be top 2 in the B1G, but I don't think that they should be a pre season #1, like Andy Katz (I believe) had them a month ago.

As for Michigan, they do bring back three key players. Lost a few guys, too though. Personally not a fan of Beilien, which is why I think they will be down from last year, but they should be good still. The talent they do have though is young. Their only seniors are Blake McLimans, Josh Bartelstein, Matt Vogrich andEso Akunne. I don't see anyone who will provide senior leadership, which I think is huge.
 

Gotta keep in mind that teams bring in new players, some of which will be making big impacts from day one.

Right, lots of big time recruits in the B1G next year:

Rivals Top 50 guys:
Michigan: #11 Robinson III, #30 McGary
Wisconsin: #13 Dekker
Indiana: #19 Ferrell, #41 Hollowell, #43 Perea
MSU: #25 MSU
Iowa: #50 Woodbury
 




Top Bottom