With three-peat in hand, the Big Ten has shifted the conference bragging rights battle

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
64,049
Reaction score
22,889
Points
113
Per Scott:

But Indiana head coach Curt Cignetti doesn’t avoid the spotlight and doesn’t mince words about his team and the conference. Not only has the Big Ten won the last three national titles, but six of its members have reached, at least, the semifinals within the last three seasons, with Washington (2023), Penn State (2024) and Oregon (2025) joining the champs. The Huskies were still in the Pac-12 at the time of their appearance, which culminated in a CFP title game loss to Michigan.

“The results speak for themselves,” Cignetti said this week. “Those are facts.”

The Big Ten has come a long way from its overrated past, when Ohio State waved the banner and the rest of the league barely kept up. At the end of the 2006 and 2007 seasons, the Buckeyes lost BCS Championship Games decisively to Florida and then LSU, the start of seven consecutive titles for the SEC through 2012. Ohio State’s 2014 title in the first year of the four-team College Football Playoff gave the league an adrenaline shot, but the Big Ten won only one CFP game after that until Michigan broke through in 2023.

It wasn’t until players could receive payment for their name, image and likeness beginning in 2021 that the Big Ten started to assert itself again. This football season was the first during which schools could provide payment directly to athletes, and each of the Big Ten’s 18 members planned to spend to the $20.5 million cap across all sports. Most schools allocate much of that revenue sharing to football, which has facilitated an influx of elite transfers who have spurred the Big Ten to heightened success.


Go Gophers!!
 

Ole Miss over Tulane was the only game in the playoff the SEC won, that wasn’t SEC vs SEC. Talk about overrated. Unless I missed something, I’m sure I’ll be corrected, if I’m wrong.
 





Love to see it, but I’m not going to be like an Arkansas fan making sure everyone knows our conference is the greatest thing ever.
 


Love to see it, but I’m not going to be like an Arkansas fan making sure everyone knows our conference is the greatest thing ever.
Yeah ive always said


Conferences don’t win games, teams do.


Since Indiana, Ohio state, and Michigan won the last 3 titles I guess that means that Maryland is better than Kansas state next year
 




I just think the B1G seems to have a more developmental process to how rosters are being built in the new era of football. SEC teams seem to be so preoccupied with high end recruits, transfers, and HC's, their product is losing the fundamentals of team sport.
 

I just think the B1G seems to have a more developmental process to how rosters are being built in the new era of football. SEC teams seem to be so preoccupied with high end recruits, transfers, and HC's, their product is losing the fundamentals of team sport.
Indiana’s fundamentals were off the charts. Zero fumbles lost in like 63 quarters of football. Few penalties. I watched all their postseason games and there were very, very few missed tackles which was critical many times in preventing first downs. This is as big a reason for 16-0 as any $.
 

Love to see it, but I’m not going to be like an Arkansas fan making sure everyone knows our conference is the greatest thing ever.

I hope you're not trying to somehow equate the Arkansas football program to Gopher football.

Since 2017 when Fleck arrived, Minnesota is 66-44.

Since 2017, Arkansas (in comparison) is 40-69.

 




Yeah ive always said


Conferences don’t win games, teams do.


Since Indiana, Ohio state, and Michigan won the last 3 titles I guess that means that Maryland is better than Kansas state next year
Here is why I think it makes a difference. Maybe winning a national title doesn't feel like an achievable goal right now for teams like us, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, but making the playoff at least feels like it could be in reach. Whether it's the 12 team format or a future 16 team format eve more so. The 5th place SEC team got in the playoffs this year and some thought Texas or Vanderbilt should have been included (a 16 team playoff would have). We could be the team on the bubble at some point and the narrative that the B1G is the dominant conference in college football helps us get in.
 

Here is why I think it makes a difference. Maybe winning a national title doesn't feel like an achievable goal right now for teams like us, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, but making the playoff at least feels like it could be in reach. Whether it's the 12 team format or a future 16 team format eve more so. The 5th place SEC team got in the playoffs this year and some thought Texas or Vanderbilt should have been included (a 16 team playoff would have). We could be the team on the bubble at some point and the narrative that the B1G is the dominant conference in college football helps us get in.

Brilliant post. I'm frankly amazed that some folks don't seem to grasp this.

This also applies to the infamous preseason polls. Teams with a high ranking early in the season often appear to reap the benefit of those accolades even after it becomes apparent that they were very over rated from the start.
 

Brilliant post. I'm frankly amazed that some folks don't seem to grasp this.

This also applies to the infamous preseason polls. Teams with a high ranking early in the season often appear to reap the benefit of those accolades even after it becomes apparent that they were very over rated from the start.
Exactly. If it had been a 16 team field this year the SEC would've taken 7 of the 16 spots. The success of the conference boosts everyone in the conference. We're already battling ESPNs SEC bias. I'll always pull for a B1G team over the SEC whether I like them or not.
 

Here is why I think it makes a difference. Maybe winning a national title doesn't feel like an achievable goal right now for teams like us, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, but making the playoff at least feels like it could be in reach. Whether it's the 12 team format or a future 16 team format eve more so. The 5th place SEC team got in the playoffs this year and some thought Texas or Vanderbilt should have been included (a 16 team playoff would have). We could be the team on the bubble at some point and the narrative that the B1G is the dominant conference in college football helps us get in.
My point wasn’t that it makes no difference

My point is that the difference it makes is stupid
 


? Please explain.
I’m saying that you shouldn’t judge team 15 vs 16 based on who won the national title 3 years ago

In 2008 Florida won the national title so in 2026 Vanderbilt is rated ahead of Iowa
 

I’m saying that you shouldn’t judge team 15 vs 16 based on who won the national title 3 years ago

In 2008 Florida won the national title so in 2026 Vanderbilt is rated ahead of Iowa
So, you're not arguing that teams that are ranked early every year have an advantage? Or teams from the SEC (traditionally) and BIG 10 now, don't have an advantage? If that wasn't your argument, sorry for the question. Just wanted clarification.
 

I just think the B1G seems to have a more developmental process to how rosters are being built in the new era of football. SEC teams seem to be so preoccupied with high end recruits, transfers, and HC's, their product is losing the fundamentals of team sport.
Big ten does have more academically prestigious universities where as the SEC resides where illiteracy, meth, and obesity are the way of the land.
 

So, you're not arguing that teams that are ranked early every year have an advantage? Or teams from the SEC (traditionally) and BIG 10 now, don't have an advantage? If that wasn't your argument, sorry for the question. Just wanted clarification.
i am saying breaking ties with history is dumb
 






Top Bottom