MNVCGUY
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2011
- Messages
- 20,711
- Reaction score
- 22,599
- Points
- 113
I really don’t get what the point of this argument even is at this point.
Are people trying to prove Fleck failed early by not winning enough games in 2017?
Are we worried the old staff isn’t going to get credit for whatever the team accomplishes now?
Do some people think fans don’t understand that there were key players recruited by the old staff on the 2019 team?
What is the end goal here?
Why are some so determined to protect the legacy of a coach who left the program?
Time to move on. Not sure what is gained in this desperate attempt to make Fleck look bad when he is taking the program to new heights and turning them from an also ran into a contender.
Are people trying to prove Fleck failed early by not winning enough games in 2017?
Are we worried the old staff isn’t going to get credit for whatever the team accomplishes now?
Do some people think fans don’t understand that there were key players recruited by the old staff on the 2019 team?
What is the end goal here?
Why are some so determined to protect the legacy of a coach who left the program?
Time to move on. Not sure what is gained in this desperate attempt to make Fleck look bad when he is taking the program to new heights and turning them from an also ran into a contender.