Why weren't these guys moved to offense?
Deion Sanders
Ed Reed
Charles Woodson
They all were/are explosive with the ball. Why didn't their teams move them to WR?
I do indeed agree with both of those statements. However, as I have stated many times already in this thread, there was no need to move him to offense if all you're going to do is, in one way or another, hand or pitch him the ball. You don't need WR skills (hands, route running, blocking, etc.) to do that. Charles Woodson won a Heisman by doing this (while staying on defense).
If they do plan on turning him into a traditional WR, then fine. Grunkiejr said he's seen evidence of it already.
Because those guys were All American, Hall of Fame caliber corners. I really hope you don't think that's a legit comparison. TS obviously isn't that good or he never would've been moved last year. The thing that is killing me is that you keep making my point and you're right:
TS should've stayed at CB if (and I do mean IF) he looked like a real player there. The thing you're ignoring is that the coaches had 2 months to watch him at CB and decide if his potential there was greater than his potential on O. THEY ACTUALLY EVALUATED THE KID! Maybe he didn't have the hips for corner. Maybe he didn't have the instincts. Maybe his heart burned to play WR. WE DON'T KNOW AND NEITHER DO YOU! That's the point. They saw him and felt he'd be better at WR than DB and who are you or anyone else to tell them they made the wrong decision when you've never seen him play 1 snap at DB??????