I think part of the reason big ten west teams are on here is because recruits tend to go under the radar in the Midwest so they are not rated as high.Interesting to note the fine print underneath “The Best,” where Wisconsin and Iowa are both listed. So, three B1G West teams in the top seven.
Add Tennessee to that list...shocked it is not on the list. Basically a .500 team over the past dozen years while having an average of Top 15 classes over that period.USC and Texas seem like they would be regulars on lists like this for a number of years spanning multiple coaching staffs.
Add Tennessee to that list...shocked it is not on the list. Basically a .500 team over the past dozen years while having an average of Top 15 classes over that period.
It should be in The Worst category...Tennessee made the dishonorable mention group on the right side along with Staford and UCLA.
Texas' ranking has 2 sig figs, and LSU's ranking only has one. How is anyone supposed to take Oregon Hot Takes seriously?I love the math malpractice giving the recruits' rankings in four significant figures and the schools' rankings in three significant figures.
But for the true believers hard facts are anathema.
I mean, Hot Takes is in their name, so...Texas' ranking has 2 sig figs, and LSU's ranking only has one. How is anyone supposed to take Oregon Hot Takes seriously?