The door is open, here's a few more stats.
Number of Recruits Rank--
1. TEX
2. FLA
3. CAL
4. GEO
5. OHI
6. ALA
7. LOU
8. PEN
9. ILL
10. MCH
11. NCAR
12. VIR
Black population (raw numbers, not percentage) Rank--
1. NY
2. FLA
3. TEX
4. GEO
5. CAL
6. NCAR
7. ILL
8. MAR
9. VIR
10. LOU
11. OHI
12. MCH
13. PEN
15. ALA
New York and Maryland the aberration. Both tend to be "basketball" oriented. Otherwise the two lists are striking.
As Bud Grant said "statistics are for losers". It's things like this that are hard to discuss because each side has a presupposed opinion of race and racism, and a presupposed opinion on what should be discussed and not discussed. It's obvious that climate may have something to do with it. There are about as many blacks in Arizona or Oklahoma as in Minnesota, but the number of recruits from those two states are substantially higher (of which we don't know how many recruits are black, white, green or purple). Washington state has about the same black population (about 10% less actually), but has about double the number of recruits. The climate is more temperate there, and here in Arizona it's going to be around 85-90 degrees for tonight's local HS game.
According to MaxPreps, there are 257 high schools in Arizona that play football. 370 in Oklahoma, 341 in Washington, 447 in Minnesota.
That's even more striking. What does it say about the quality of Minnesota football in general? Has the "quality of life" made Minnesota football players "soft"?
I certainly don't have an answer, but it is interesting to discuss.