Right, I guess I'm not connecting the dots on how an explanation of a misinterpreted tweet turned into a rant against Musk/Trump/MAGAMusk owns Twitter/X.
I take his explanation at face value for bailing on Twitter/X. Patrick was ready to be done with the forum anyway, regardless of the misinterpreted Tweet, due to Musk (& the "dipwads" that respond).Right, I guess I'm not connecting the dots on how an explanation of a misinterpreted tweet turned into a rant against Musk/Trump/MAGA
Lol. A poorly worded innocuous tweet (should have just apologized for such), followed up by two inflammatory tweets posted by a friend/co-worker, flaming Trump, Elon, Reagan, republicans; quickly leaving the platform, sure.I take his explanation at face value for bailing on Twitter/X. Patrick was ready to be done with the forum anyway, regardless of the misinterpreted Tweet, due to Musk (& the "dipwads" that respond).
That's my understanding via post #35 in this thread.
His "dipwads" comment was specifically to those that were commenting on his columns without reading them, not his tweets themselves.Getting sick of "dipwads" is a ridiculous excuse, even in part - he goes fishing for those responses.
Frankly, no response or explanation was necessary and no doubt the issue would have died on the vine. It wasn't a racist tweet and a reasonable person wouldn't think otherwise. I suspect Pat's primary employer, the overly sensitive and uber-woke strib, applied pressure to Pat to respond in some way. He, of course, a man of no magnamity, humility or humbleness couldn't respond gracefully and instead went full on hate, intolerance and TDS on the way out.