To be successful you have to have supperior players to your opponent at the majority of the positions on defense versus the offense.
This scheme works well with having a Strong Safety that can make tackles and support the run in the mode of #22 TC and like Royston. SF24 you are right though in it is susceptable the scheme to play action and TE burning the Gophers up the seem. How is Kim doing, is he still trying to work on getting in to football as a player CFL, the UFL or NFL camps, what about coaching if his playing days are over, you would think PA could pull some strings with the Vikes for an internship or training camp roll? e.
...Actually I think it is a great defense against passing teams, the Syracuse game was the most fun I have had watching a Goph defense in a while, but we needed tacklers like Kim and Tinsley last year agaisnt power teams. I like Wells a lot, but I thought he was going to get killed out there against power teams.
I was thinking the same thing quite a bit last year. With the way the defense sets up (wide splits on the line, trying to get upfield every snap) it seemed like they were set up to play against a style of offense we don't see a lot in the B1G. Combine that with having undersized and/or out of position guys in quite a few spots (end, LB, safety) and it makes stopping the run, especially in the middle of the field, an uphill battle. But I don't know how much of that is system (stressing speed over size) and how much is just the staff working with the players they have.
I agree with most of your take. We had the part in bold in 2011 and it still didn't work. If you bring your SS up teams will run double moves with the wr opposite the remaining S. It's hard enough to stop a double with a pass rush and impossible without a pass rush. The will also make the FS play coverage by running seam routes with the TE which will force both CB's to play man with no over the top help; there goes your pass defense. Now you have a quarter of your defense running away from the line of scrimmage with their backs turned; one missed tackle.......
That SS can lead the conference in tackling (which he did) and it won't matter....what I'm saying is I don't like the scheme. To be successful you have to have supperior players to your opponent at the majority of the positions on defense versus the offense.
Now that I have said that....watch the gophers win the Rosebowl with the nations leading defense!
Interesting. I never really thought about it like that. As many times as I do disagree with your opinions, I do have to defer to you as far as opinions and schemes in the defensive backfield as I probably have no idea what I'm talking about.
You must be related to my wife.
Against arguably a tougher schedule next year, we would like to see the win total increase from 6 to 7 or 8. I think overall we are definitely moving in the right direction, but if I could pick two things that I would like to see marked improvement for next season it would be a) ability to run the ball and b) ability to stop the run.
So on the defensive side, will an offseason of coaching + weight room + some new players = the ability to stop the likes of Iowa and Northwestern from gashing us for large runs?