Rocksoldier
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 21, 2023
- Messages
- 209
- Reaction score
- 265
- Points
- 63
Perfect way to put itThe goal is Clem era success without the scandal. The minimum is Tubby level success.
Perfect way to put itThe goal is Clem era success without the scandal. The minimum is Tubby level success.
Good work.Trying to figure out what a reasonable expectation is for making the NCAA Tournament is an interesting question.
Clem - 13 years - 6 tournaments (3 of those fell during the Ganglegate mess)
Monson - 8 years - 1 tournament (little tough to judge him fairly with the penalties he dealt with)
Tubby - 6 years - 3 tournaments
Pitino - 8 years - 2 tournaments
2 NCAA tournaments every 5 years feels like a decent baseline expectation with the hope for more. That is basically what Fran has done at Iowa.
Above and beyond that.....if the Big Ten stays with their current structure for a while then expectation should be qualifying for the Big Ten tournament most years and finishing top half of the conference on a somewhat regular basis.
Great summation.in the 27 years since the Final Four appearance, the Gophers have made the NCAA tournament 7 times. that averages one appearance every 3.9 seasons (25.6%)
as MNVCGUY noted, Tubby made the NCAA tournament 3 times in 6 years. that means coaches other than Tubby have made the NCAA tournament 4 times in 21 seasons - or once every 5.3 seasons (18.9%).
that's 27 seasons under 5 different coaches. (including the last couple of years under Clem).
So - what needs to change?
the Administration needs to re-commit to the basketball program
the AD needs to make the basketball program a priority
they need to find a head Coach who can recruit and maintain talent in the NIL and Portal era.
and the program needs enough NIL money to buy a much higher level of talent
I am NOT saying it's impossible. I AM saying it's a hell of a lot more difficult than just "hiring the right coach."
Yeah, coaching change feels inevitable and will almost certainly help some as long as they get the right guy.Great summation.
Complex problems require in-depth solutions.
I would love to see this but let’s be realistic. We have never had that type of program. Tubby was competing in a totally different environment than the present time. Until we boost our NIL payouts no game changer Coach is going to come hereI say NCAA tournament 4 out of 5 years. Sweet 16 1 out of those 4 years.
Get the right guy in here and everything changes. Set the bar high.
30% 3 pt is reasonable, but is there a team in the world that shoots FTs at 85%?1) .500 or better in conference play, every year.
2) .625 or better overall record every year.
In other words, make this program respectable again, even to be feared occasionally.
I'm also the guy who expects:
30% 3pt FG
85% FT
It should be the Gophers.30% 3 pt is reasonable, but is there a team in the world that shoots FTs at 85%?
Best ever in the NBA has been 84%, so let me grab that mic for you quickIt should be the Gophers.
*micdrop*
4 out of 5 has not happened. But Clem made 6 in his last 11 years and two Sweet 16s. That is not an unrealistic level.I would love to see this but let’s be realistic. We have never had that type of program. Tubby was competing in a totally different environment than the present time. Until we boost our NIL payouts no game changer Coach is going to come here
I may be overly optimistic, but don't you think a winning season or two where we just make the tournament would significantly help our NIL?I would love to see this but let’s be realistic. We have never had that type of program. Tubby was competing in a totally different environment than the present time. Until we boost our NIL payouts no game changer Coach is going to come here
So you set your standards based on fitting in not excelling? No wonder we're not considered a blue chip school and have struggled ever since 1997.Best ever in the NBA has been 84%, so let me grab that mic for you quick
I should set my expectations higher. We need to have the first 50 win season in college basketball history. You're going to run out of things to drop soonSo you set your standards based on fitting in not excelling? No wonder we're not considered a blue chip school and have struggled ever since 1997.
You probably think the administration is doing the right thing not raising the 1997 Final Four banner, too.
Low standards equals low results.
*sound system drop*
What? I'm not gonna threaten my standing in the Merry Marvel Curmudgeon Society. Do you think I'm insane?I should set my expectations higher. We need to have the first 50 win season in college basketball history. You're going to run out of things to drop soon
Not sure how this is calculated but it sounds like this is the estimated payout of the proposed revenue sharing plan if it becomes a reality.If I am interpreting correctly, this data shows we are 10th in NIL contributions within our conference.
Ahead of Rutgers, Purdue, Wisconsin, Maryland, Nebraska, UCLA. (No data for private schools NW and USC.).
How the funds are distributed within each athletic dept is another issue of course.
Estimated Size of Each B1G NIL Purse
I don't think I saw this posted elsewhere. It's an estimate from the NCAA, using what I'd describe as rough but reasonable methods, on the size of the NIL collectives for each school. https://nil-ncaa.com/big10/?utm_source=chatgpt.com The estimated number is the "Collective Funding" category...rutgers.forums.rivals.com
With 5 players on the ice.Match the football program short term. Match the Volleyball next and finally get to the Hockey level.