gophersfan
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 5,360
- Reaction score
- 819
- Points
- 113
Who you got. OKC is blowing out Denver and not looking back. Game 1 is Tuesday in OKC.
Wolves certainly have a shot, but if had to bet the mortgage would go with OKC.
We will have to play better. Won't get away with turning the ball over 20 times against the Thunder.
Thunder have a lot of size, Rudy will play more minutes. How will that go?
Would really help if DDV and NAW break out of their shooting slumps.
Can Julius shoot over Holmgren successfully?
They do? SGA is their 3rd tallest player in the rotation at 6'6". Everyone else in their rotation after SGA, Chet, and Hartenstein are 6'5" or smaller.
The Wolves will have a significant size advantage, just like they did in the last 2 series.
"Thunder have a lot of size, Rudy will play more minutes.".
Point made was that OKC has more height than our previous two opponents. That will cause Rudy to play more in this upcoming series.
GS two tallest starters were 6'9" and 6'7"
LA two tallest starters were 6'9" and 6'8"
OKC has 7'1" and 7'0"
Even considering the starting 5's of these three teams, OKC clearly with more height.
(LA had Hayes, but he hardly played and was a nonfactor.)
"Thunder have a lot of size, Rudy will play more minutes.".
Point made was that OKC has more height than our previous two opponents. That will cause Rudy to play more in this upcoming series.
GS two tallest starters were 6'9" and 6'7"
LA two tallest starters were 6'9" and 6'8"
OKC has 7'1" and 7'0"
Even considering the starting 5's of these three teams, OKC clearly with more height.
(LA had Hayes, but he hardly played and was a nonfactor.)
I still disagree that the 'Thunder have a lot of size', they don't. They are slightly bigger than the last two teams because they have 1 true center. Hartenstein is averaging less mpg so far this postseason than Rudy, so I don't see Rudy's minutes changing significantly.
Chet is not a traditional big man, which is why he struggles with the Wolves size.
Agree.. OKC ‘s guards are good size as well.. plus Mike Conley is not
Chet plays big defensively with his shot blocking.I still disagree that the 'Thunder have a lot of size', they don't. They are slightly bigger than the last two teams because they have 1 true center. Hartenstein is averaging less mpg so far this postseason than Rudy, so I don't see Rudy's minutes changing significantly.
Chet is not a traditional big man, which is why he struggles with the Wolves size.
It always sucks to lose the last game of the season, but reaching the conference finals and losing to the best team in the league is nothing to be ashamed of. This season is a major success no matter what happens against OKC.I was hoping to come on here and read some good news, but seems the overall sentiment so far is something like less than 50/50 optimistic.
Losing in the Conf Finals two years in a row, with a still active "streak" for the state/market, would be a very bitter one to swallow.
The Thunder's HCA is real and the calls SGA gets are real. They are a really, really good team. The wolves can win this series but only if literally all eight players play above the norm.
They also have a lot of guard/wing size (and depth). Their “size” is more they don’t play anyone who’s undersized and their guards can switch onto forwards and their centers can switch onto forwards. Makes it that much harder to put the ball to the rim and makes you have to defend better at the rim. Thinks that’s more why Rudy’s minutes are going to be high as you’re going to need rim protection against this team driving the ball, not so much because there’s going to be a bunch of post up playI still disagree that the 'Thunder have a lot of size', they don't. They are slightly bigger than the last two teams because they have 1 true center. Hartenstein is averaging less mpg so far this postseason than Rudy, so I don't see Rudy's minutes changing significantly.
Chet is not a traditional big man, which is why he struggles with the Wolves size.
The "good news" is that this thread even exists.I was hoping to come on here and read some good news, but seems the overall sentiment so far is something like less than 50/50 optimistic.
Losing in the Conf Finals two years in a row, with a still active "streak" for the state/market, would be a very bitter one to swallow.
Where are you going to hide Mike on defense then? That’s the crux Finch has to figure out if he wants to keep Mike out there and is part of what hurts to have none of our young guards have taken the next stepGet Chet in foul trouble. Avoid foul trouble for McDaniels. Big key to success imo.
Mike Conley needs to play a lot. NAW and Donte will have the ball stripped a lot if they are pg's.
Rudy needs to win the center matchup. He will go up against Hartenstein and Chet. Rudy needs to get the best out of those matchups.
Split the first two games.
The numbers don't lie. See post #7. Agree to disagree.
Yeah man, keep Slim on the court and snatch one in OKCAvoid foul trouble for McDaniels. Big key to success imo
Split the first two games.
You can’t just look at height. OKC has incredible length ( it’s part of the wolves with Jalen And Rudy as well). They’ve got long lanky guards who can switch. Effectively what Chet is as wellThe numbers don't lie, but you're letting one - two players really skew your perception of OKC.
I pulled the average height of each teams playoff rotation. OKC is bigger than the Lakers by .1", and I didn't include Jaxon Hayes.
Average rotation height by team.
Wolves: 6'6.6"
OKC: 6'6.2"
LAL: 6'6.1"
GS: 6'5.5"
I'm sure you could weight this by minutes played and get a better idea of how the height really matches up, but that would make the Wolves even bigger as NAW/Conely play the fewest minutes in the rotation. Hartenstein plays comparable minutes to Naz/Conley.
The Lakers were bigger/longer at the wings than OKC, they just didn't have a center.