UK 2020 Recruiting Class has Six Charged with First Degree Burglary—All Still on Team. Elite?


This is why Ohio St. has a sign:

BM-p4yoCEAEhqan.jpg
 


Last edited:





They will be more worried about Jeff Brohm coming to Louisville after he is sh#t canned at Purdue than a bunch of crooks on the team.
 

It just means more in the sec, guys. We in the B1G just wouldn’t understand.

it-just-means-more-2.jpg
 





Burglary? Not robbery?
Color me perplexed.
Obviously laws differ by state, but in Wisconsin for example (because it was an easy Google search):

  • Theft occurs when someone “intentionally takes and carries away, uses, transfers, conceals, or retains possession of movable property of another without the other’s consent and with intent to deprive the owner permanently of possession of such property.”
  • Burglary occurs when someone “intentionally enters [a place] without the consent of the person in lawful possession and with intent to steal or commit a felony.”
  • Robbery occurs when someone “takes property from the person or presence of the owner by either…using force…or by threatening the imminent use of force.”
 

Any way, sounds like a nice group of people ....

Can't believe they'll stay on the team, or in school for that matter.
 




Posting these signs like these are micro aggressions. Are these signs everywhere on campus or are they reserved for a specific group of people.
 

Posting these signs like these are micro aggressions. Are these signs everywhere on campus or are they reserved for a specific group of people.
Actions speak louder than words. In the SEC, words are there to CYA.
 


Posting these signs like these are micro aggressions. Are these signs everywhere on campus or are they reserved for a specific group of people.
LOL, idk. Def sus, tho. I think signs similar to this one 👇 are posted around the pchem lecture halls.


58z10ds5rna41.png
 


This will turn into nothing, charges will be dropped.

I also love that people in here want them off the team before the legal process plays out. Imagine is someone accused a bunch of Gophers of something and they got kicked off the team only to be found clear of any wrongdoing...
 

This will turn into nothing, charges will be dropped.

I also love that people in here want them off the team before the legal process plays out. Imagine is someone accused a bunch of Gophers of something and they got kicked off the team only to be found clear of any wrongdoing...
Mere allegations are one thing. But I actually believe that the Gophers would suspend or drop players who were arrested by the police and formally charged with a crime such as first degree burglary and/or wanton endangerment using a pistol. I also think that the majority of teams outside the SEC would do the same.
 

Mere allegations are one thing. But I actually believe that the Gophers would suspend or drop players who were arrested by the police and formally charged with a crime such as first degree burglary and/or wanton endangerment using a pistol. I also think that the majority of teams outside the SEC would do the same.
Yep. Agree
 

I also love that people in here want them off the team before the legal process plays out.
Criminal charges have been brought. That means the prosecutor thinks the evidence is good enough to win at trial.
 

Obviously laws differ by state, but in Wisconsin for example (because it was an easy Google search):

  • Theft occurs when someone “intentionally takes and carries away, uses, transfers, conceals, or retains possession of movable property of another without the other’s consent and with intent to deprive the owner permanently of possession of such property.”
  • Burglary occurs when someone “intentionally enters [a place] without the consent of the person in lawful possession and with intent to steal or commit a felony.”
  • Robbery occurs when someone “takes property from the person or presence of the owner by either…using force…or by threatening the imminent use of force.”
So (in wisconsin) a theft would be I come home, and my TV is gone.
A burglary would be I walk in on would-be theives and they run away without taking anything.
And a robery would be I walk in on the would-be theives, and one of them threatens me to prevent me from doing anything, and then take my TV.

Right?
 

Criminal charges have been brought. That means the prosecutor thinks the evidence is good enough to win at trial.
Thinks. Doesn’t mean they did anything. Charges have never been dropped. No one has ever been found not guilty.
 

So (in wisconsin) a theft would be I come home, and my TV is gone.
A burglary would be I walk in on would-be theives and they run away without taking anything.
And a robery would be I walk in on the would-be theives, and one of them threatens me to prevent me from doing anything, and then take my TV.

Right?
Nope. Burglary includes entering a home (or other building) or business and stealing while theft does not. You don't need to be present for either to occur, but someone would need to be present for robbery.
 

Mere allegations are one thing. But I actually believe that the Gophers would suspend or drop players who were arrested by the police and formally charged with a crime such as first degree burglary and/or wanton endangerment using a pistol. I also think that the majority of teams outside the SEC would do the same.
But the gophers didn’t when the rape case occurred. Or whatever that was.
 

LOL, idk. Def sus, tho. I think signs similar to this one 👇 are posted around the pchem lecture halls.


58z10ds5rna41.png
If she can't consent, she can't "not consent" either, right? Has this ever been tried? Like, how can you prove you were drunk at the time, when it's hours in the past? Couldn't the guy say we started drinking *after* sex and she was sober during sex?
 

But the gophers didn’t when the rape case occurred. Or whatever that was.
If I recall correctly (and I may not be), criminal charges from the DA were not brought against the 12. School policy got them suspended initially. Again, correct me if my old brain has failed me again. In this case, charges have been filed. I would expect suspensions until case resolved, one way or the other.
 

If I recall correctly (and I may not be), criminal charges from the DA were not brought against the 12. School policy got them suspended initially. Again, correct me if my old brain has failed me again. In this case, charges have been filed. I would expect suspensions until case resolved, one way or the other.
No charges. The DA specifically did not bring charges (and commented on not bringing charges) twice. That's not super common unless they were giving a wink and a nod (IMO).
 




Top Bottom