bleedsmaroonandgold
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2011
- Messages
- 7,068
- Reaction score
- 2,329
- Points
- 113
Yes, that is one thing you have right. Minnesota has won two straight. Iowa has lost 3 of its last 4.
Perfectly said.
Yes, that is one thing you have right. Minnesota has won two straight. Iowa has lost 3 of its last 4.
Iowa is a decent team - certainly a top 50 team IMO, and maybe even top 40.
That said, my complaint from the game is what we've seen before, like at Northwestern. The team gets out to a nice little lead and thinks they can dial back the effort and just coast. It's the classic tortoise and the hare situation. The floor motion, passing and general effort went down a notch or two after they built that early lead, allowing Iowa to grab some momentum and confidence. And once you've lost that mental edge, it's hard to get it back. Really good teams don't have any coast in them. The Gophs coasted against Nebraska, too, but the Huskers were unable to make them pay.
Maybe a little, but I think the biggest thing was we stopped hitting open shots. We had a lot of good looks that just didn't fall. I find it hard to believe you get a ton of good shots if you're just coasting.
Iowa is making slow and steady progress from where they were in December or January....But they are not going to be an NCAA tourney team because Marble has regressed and their 3 Freshmen aren't quite ready to step up yet. They have a chance to be very solid next year. But for now, they are a very mediocre team and we should have run them off the court and won by 15 to 25. The fact that we didn't is direct reflection on Tubby's inability to coach a team that improves during the season. I don't know about his Kentucky teams, but his teams with the Gophers have ALWAYS stagnated or flat our regressed. The Iowa game was more or less a reflection of us and Iowa going in opposite directions, only Austin Hollins stepped up and put off the losing for at least one more game.
TJ, your story is similar to a friend of mine who called me after the Iowa game and asked, "What's wrong with the Gophers?" I told him what's wrong is the Gophers just played a so-so game vs. a pretty decent opponent, were down 4 with 2 minutes left to play, and still found a way to win the game.
Interesting that my thread is still going. I haven't seen anyone make this point yet...are you OK with Fran McCaffery's squad passing Tubby's next year? Because that almost undoubtedly will happen. The Hawkeyes were underdogs to the Gophers in the last 3 games played between the teams and almost swept all 3 of them. This year, with their best player being a sophomore and their point guard being a freshman. From what I have read from many Tubby defenders, I have no doubt that many would excuse a terrible season from the Gophers if Tubby's best players were that young.
I re-watched the game late last night and the Hawkeyes had a plan for every circumstance after the initial 14-3 start. When they got a defensive rebound, they ran and normally got a good shot. When the Gophers went zone, they found guys on the baseline for easy looks. When the Gophers picked up full court, they easily beat our press. The Gophers had the better athletes, but did not look like they knew what they were supposed to do when the Hawkeyes went zone. When the Hawkeyes came out in a press, the Gophers also looked confused and turned it over. In the last 5 minutes of the game, Joe Coleman had to make two tough individual moves to cut the Hawkeye lead to two.
I can't imagine anyone who watched that game on Sunday coming away from it saying " The Gophers are the better coached team" or " I'd take the the next two years of Gopher Basketball over the next two years of Hawkeye Basketball".
Interesting that my thread is still going. I haven't seen anyone make this point yet...are you OK with Fran McCaffery's squad passing Tubby's next year? Because that almost undoubtedly will happen. The Hawkeyes were underdogs to the Gophers in the last 3 games played between the teams and almost swept all 3 of them. This year, with their best player being a sophomore and their point guard being a freshman. From what I have read from many Tubby defenders, I have no doubt that many would excuse a terrible season from the Gophers if Tubby's best players were that young.
I re-watched the game late last night and the Hawkeyes had a plan for every circumstance after the initial 14-3 start. When they got a defensive rebound, they ran and normally got a good shot. When the Gophers went zone, they found guys on the baseline for easy looks. When the Gophers picked up full court, they easily beat our press. The Gophers had the better athletes, but did not look like they knew what they were supposed to do when the Hawkeyes went zone. When the Hawkeyes came out in a press, the Gophers also looked confused and turned it over. In the last 5 minutes of the game, Joe Coleman had to make two tough individual moves to cut the Hawkeye lead to two.
I can't imagine anyone who watched that game on Sunday coming away from it saying " The Gophers are the better coached team" or " I'd take the the next two years of Gopher Basketball over the next two years of Hawkeye Basketball".
Rouser, are you calling me a meathead?
Sal does hit it right on the head. We all wish every season was nice & tidy with nothing but well-played games and convincing victories for our team, but that's not the way a season works, not even for the likes of the Dukes, Kansas', Kentuckys, North Carolinas, and Michigan States of the world. Ebbs and flows. Why are folks so aghast at the ebbs and flows of a long season?
Am like everyone else, frustrated as h*ll the Gophers aren't playing up to snuff right now, but that's just all part of the journey. It wouldn't be college basketball season if I didn't have something to fuss about throughout the course of a season. With the emphasis on fuss, not panic or go into meltdown mode.
TJ, your story is similar to a friend of mine who called me after the Iowa game and asked, "What's wrong with the Gophers?" I told him what's wrong is the Gophers just played a so-so game vs. a pretty decent opponent, were down 4 with 2 minutes left to play, and still found a way to win the game. Then I reminded him that the Gophers are 17-5 having played a reprsentative schedule (Tubby's had some stinker nonconference schedules, but this one's turning out solid), and are currently above .500 in what is considered the best conference in the country. I didn't even mention that the Gophers were ranked in the top 25, or that they were in top 10 of the RPI. ... like that's a regular occurrence around here.
Could or should the Gophers be better than 5-4 at this point? Absolutely, but it's not exactly "sky is falling" material. They also could have been worse than 12-1 prior to the B1G season.