Trump wants to change/limit NIL.

Donate To GopherHole







Bob_Loblaw said:
What does this have to do with NIL and potential NIL standards?
Click to expand...

You have yet to articulate any standards where SCOTUS has not already struck down those proposed standards. Explain it to us in plain English Bob, What standards do you think will not violate Alston? So far, most of the things you suggest would violate that ruling.
 

One, there is no more chaos in the NIL than in any other area of life. If the NIL in an unrestricted form topples MIchigan and Alabama off their perennial perch, oops. I'll cheer. If it doesn't, then the natural order of the NCAA is unmeritoriously preserved. A little chaos in the system would be a benefit to other schools wanting to compete. They should welcome disruption of the existing order. I certainly would welcome Minnesota rising in the pecking order with our combined wealth. Disruption is normal and natural in competitive industries. In fact, the lack of disruption shows us when a system is not competitive. Right now, there is a calcified and entrenched set of schools at the top begging all other schools to not disrupt their primacy. Why would any Minnesota fan or alum want to maintain the status quo? I don't. I want to disrupt it to our advantage. I think Minnesota has an alumni base and marketing potential that is significantly larger than most financially. Setting rules on Minnesotans shouldn't go over well as we pull out our donations. In fact, it would be counterproductive in every sense.
 

He needs to worry about our economy and get that right instead of worry about these kid's.

Focus on the damn White House!
 



GopherGrit said:
I think a big aspect of the House settlement that isn't getting as much attention is that all NIL deals (third party or anything) will have to pass through and be approved by a clearinghouse organization, going forward.

Meaning … the athlete needs to actually perform legitimate actions and/or there needs to be a legitimate business use of the athlete's NIL taking place. Not simply "here's a bag of cash, and that's legal now because it's 'NIL'".
Click to expand...
The reason to have it pass through a clearinghouse probably has almost nothing to do with assuring athletes are being compensated at market rate for the endorsement work/ NIL licensing work they are supposedly doing. It would be nearly impossible to establish FMV for this, and even harder to police.

The reason to have it pass through a clearinghouse is to make sure the deals being “presented” to athletes are real. Because as it is right now, most are not.
 

dbrad29 said:
He needs to worry about our economy and get that right instead of worry about these kid's.

Focus on the damn White House!
Click to expand...
I actually agree with you but the guys just a GOAT at making a deal that’s good for both sides.
 

ShushPush said:
You have yet to articulate any standards where SCOTUS has not already struck down those proposed standards. Explain it to us in plain English Bob, What standards do you think will not violate Alston? So far, most of the things you suggest would violate that ruling.
Click to expand...
I've said this countless times, it's been the same standard for 135 years - reasonableness.

Long before you littered this board with your wall of nonsense, I've been saying that none of the NCAA's rules would be upheld under the Sherman Act. None of them. I discussed how it's a real possibility in the next 5 years that a player like Luka Garza will return to college basketball and make $5 million per year, that the 4/5 year limit will be dissolved, etc. In no way shape or form do I believe the NCAA stands a chance to unreasonably limit free trade with respect to players moving.

Now, that does not mean there are no limits to free trade. The Sherman Act only protects against undue restraints on trade. There are non-solicit agreements, non-compete agreements, contractual limits. Those cannot be put into place right now because of Title IX. Universities and NIL organizations cannot freely contract because they exist under the rubric of Title IX.

All of my suggestions have been promoting a freer market - eliminating Title IX for NCAA revenue sports - so that the players and the schools and collectives are MORE free to contract.
 

Bob_Loblaw said:
- so that the players and the schools and collectives are MORE free to contract.
Click to expand...
I know you mean pronunciation for "contract" as in "legal contract" but if you take the other way to pronounce it, "contract" like the Twins almost did in 2002, it's almost ironic as I think that might happen. This whole thing is so messy fans might lose interest (for the first time in forever, I'm more interested in the upcoming NFL season than college).
 




GopherGrit said:
Would you be OK with the Exec Order if it said something as simple as "Student-athletes at NCAA member institutions have the right to collectively bargain with the NCAA for revenue sharing and similar benefits, without being required to be employees of the schools" and left it at that?

Then the athletes could bargain the amount of the cap, without it being mandated?
Click to expand...
No F'ckg Way! What does the mis-use of an Executive order have to do with this issue? Trump has no idea about what is going on, he just had someone bend his ear about it. Just like everything, his ideas are based upon who was the last person to talk to him.

It is really fairly simple, get the power conferences together to set the rules to give a more even playing field. Then enforce the rules. Period!
 

In an appearance on Fox News Channel last year, Saban urged Congress to step in and make NIL "equal across the board."

"And I think that should still exist for all players, but not just a pay-for-play system like we have now where whoever raises the most money in their collective can pay the most for the players, which is not a level playing field. I think in any competitive venue, you want to have some guidelines that gives everyone an equal opportunity to have a chance to be successful," he said.

It appears that Saban's heart is in the right place. This is an extremely complicated issue and the NCAA basically dropped the ball years ago to the point that it is today. Its not an equal opportunity. But there never was an effective and fair way to administer how we take care of college student/athletes. Now we have chaos.

One thing won't change. The athletes will continue to be paid above and beyond their scholarship.

Pro sports has a system(s) that seem to work. Its time we look at that.
 

Bayfield Gopher said:
In an appearance on Fox News Channel last year, Saban urged Congress to step in and make NIL "equal across the board."

"And I think that should still exist for all players, but not just a pay-for-play system like we have now where whoever raises the most money in their collective can pay the most for the players, which is not a level playing field. I think in any competitive venue, you want to have some guidelines that gives everyone an equal opportunity to have a chance to be successful," he said.

It appears that Saban's heart is in the right place. This is an extremely complicated issue and the NCAA basically dropped the ball years ago to the point that it is today. Its not an equal opportunity. But there never was an effective and fair way to administer how we take care of college student/athletes. Now we have chaos.

One thing won't change. The athletes will continue to be paid above and beyond their scholarship.

Pro sports has a system(s) that seem to work. Its time we look at that.
Click to expand...
College football has never had anything remotely resembling a level playing field. People need to stop with that talk.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.



Top Bottom